Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 17, 1998 <br /> ROLL <br /> The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members <br /> present: Chair Dale Lindquist, Sandra Smith, Janice Berg, William Stoddard, and Lili <br /> McMillan. Charles Schroeder and Elizabeth Hawn were absent. Mayor Jabbour and <br /> Council Member Peterson were present. The following represented the City Staff: Senior <br /> Planning Coordinator Michael Gaffron, City Planner Elizabeth Van Zomeren, Planning <br /> Intern Brad Bressler, and Recorder Sherry Frost. Chair Lindquist called the meeting to <br /> order at 6:34 p.m. <br /> OLD BUSINESS: CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARINGS <br /> (#1) #2312 CLAUS WEILER AND RENEE MEERKINS, 1135 NORTH ARM <br /> DRIVE - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WITH VARIANCES - 6:34-6:41 P.M. <br /> The Applicants were present. <br /> Bressler reported that the application is for variances to rebuild a previously existing deck <br /> and an additional garage. The application was tabled at the January meeting to enable to <br /> the applicants to determine the size of the previous decks. Staff had been unaware that <br /> decks had previously existed on the residence. The variances and a CUP are required due <br /> • to the accessory structure being placed in front of the principal structure and the lot being <br /> considered a through lot. The proposed decks require street and bluff setback variances. <br /> The Planning Commission had requested the accessory structure be reduced in size to <br /> meet the 1000 s.f maximum footprint allowed. The structure is now proposed at 968 s.f. <br /> The proposed accessory structure meets the side setback of 10' as requested by the <br /> Commission and will be located 33' from the side lot line. <br /> The decks are proposed to extend 8' from the rear of the residence towards Elmwood <br /> Avenue and the bluff. The proposed decks are smaller in size that had existed. Another <br /> change to the plan is the proposal that the garage be 1-1/2 stories, rather than one story. <br /> The structure would meet height requirements. <br /> Bressler said Staff recommended approval of the CUP for locating an accessory structure <br /> on a through lot and locating an accessory structure in front of the principal structure for <br /> the garage. Staff also recommens approval of bluff setback and street setback variances <br /> for the decks. Staff recommended the shed be located to a conforming location or <br /> removed. The applicants have agreed to remove the shed if approval is received for the <br /> accessory structure. <br /> The applicant said he agreed with Staffs recommendation. <br /> • There were no public comments. <br />