Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 20, 1998 <br /> • - - <br /> (#22 #2329 Bob Waade Continued) <br /> A 30'wide outlot is proposed over the existing shared driveway serving the four existing <br /> neighboring residences and the four proposed new dwelling units. This far exceeds the <br /> City's three unit threshold for a driveway, requiring a road. The applicant is asking for an <br /> easement to serve the back lot, requiring 3/4 acre with 1/2 acre in front. 100'widths are <br /> required. <br /> One plans calls for the road to come across the north along the property line of Lot 1 to <br /> Lot 2. A 50' outlot could be a road, and Gaffron questioned whether it would need to be <br /> developed without the neighboring properties. <br /> Once option according to Gaffi-on would be a development with 7-8 townhouse units. If a <br /> PRD, it would require a 200' setback with shared or private road. If the development is as <br /> proposed, a driveway to serve 4 lots could continue to serve the houses in the <br /> neighborhood. This is however for the rest of the neighborhood. <br /> Gaffron said the duplex credit in the LR-1 C-1 District requires a conditional use on a <br /> single lot. It meets the sewered requirement, being adjacent to commercial property, and <br /> construction within 200' of the district. The property does not meet the width requirement <br /> but does meet the area requirement. <br /> Gaffron said the backlot consideration is P roblematic for hardcover. It would use the full <br /> 25% of hardcover allowed in the 75-250' zone but have a minimal driveway and apron. <br /> More detail is required. <br /> A question of lake access is also a consideration. How many of the units would receive <br /> access. Gaffron questioned whether the plan would be approved for access by the LMCD. <br /> The code stipulates lake access to as many as have title. The ability to have 4 slips on 1 <br /> dock is not probable with requirement of having lakeshore. <br /> Lindquist asked the applicant what his intentions are for the property. Waade said he <br /> would like to have 4 slips and keep the units as rental units with two separate duplex units. <br /> Lindquist asked what determinations are needed. Gaffron said the plan would require <br /> Council and LMCD review. He said code allows only 4 slips on 1 property only. Hawn <br /> acknowledged that this problem is created with the lot ownership and lakeshore as <br /> developed. <br /> Lindquist suggested for the duplex plan to create the ability for the road to serve all 7 <br /> properties with a 50' outlot rather than an easement. A decision has to be made regarding <br /> where the road is to be located, who is to build it, whether it be private or public, and if <br /> the road will be shared. <br /> 43 <br />