My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-20-1998 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
01-20-1998 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2019 2:48:31 PM
Creation date
7/10/2019 2:48:29 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 20, 1998 <br /> (#19 - #2326 Orono Development - Continued) <br /> GaffIon, while acknowledging guidelines, said additional work is required on the plans. <br /> Tom Dillon noted that the 11,000 s.f building is less than what was previously planned. <br /> He anticipates a 5-6 month construction period. Dillon feels the two egress locations on <br /> CoRd 19, with the southern egress being shared with Culver's, is an improvement for the <br /> property. He noted the service window location is toward the rear of the building being <br /> the best location for both the building and the neighborhood. <br /> Dillon felt the hardcover issue was difficult to solve with the slopes, elevations, and pond. <br /> He noted the lack of flexibility with the property being within two lakeshore zones. He <br /> indicated the ponding and filtration to marsh areas will aid water quality. Dillon asked for <br /> clarification on the 20' setback requirement from Olive Avenue. It was his belief the <br /> setback would be at 23' and meet the requirement. Dillon noted he has not answered all of <br /> the concerns but will work with Staff. <br /> Mike Sepena reviewed the site plan. He referenced the confining steep elevations, which <br /> drop, for a minimum depth. Changes to this and the driveway are being kept to a <br /> minimum to reduce the need for fill. He indicated the 10'wall does taper upward. The 5' <br /> variance to the front yard setback is necessary, according to Dillon, to maintain lineal <br /> • integrity. He felt if Shadywood Road was expanded, this site is only one of many that <br /> would be affected. <br /> Gaffron clarified the setback issue. <br /> John Erickson comments that the Shadywood setback is unrealistic as the property falls <br /> away to the back. He thought the plan for planters would be an improvement. Erickson <br /> feels Olive Avenue is so narrow that it is practically a bike path now. He did not believe <br /> the neighbors would object to the parking extending to the back of the building and would <br /> most likely be the area where employees would park. Erickson is in support of bushes <br /> planted separating the retaining wall from his property, which he says would be a vast <br /> improvement to what currently exists. <br /> There were no other public comments. <br /> Schroeder agreed that a 20' setback would not be possible. McMillan said she would like <br /> to see more green space, however. Dillon said the area in front of the building on the <br /> County right-of-way is all green space, along with other areas he pointed out. Sepena also <br /> noted the open areas on the corners where landscaping could be located. Dillon said he <br /> would work with Staff on a landscaping plan. <br /> 37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.