My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-20-1998 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
01-20-1998 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2019 2:48:31 PM
Creation date
7/10/2019 2:48:29 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 20, 1998 <br /> • - - Continued) <br /> #2332 Zoning Code Amendment ) <br /> Lindquist informed Katainan that a few display cars was satisfactory. Schroeder said the <br /> concern was not with the sale of classic cars but with a used car lot. McMillan added that <br /> it also would have required amending the code as the use did not fit in with permitted or <br /> conditional uses as written. <br /> Schroeder said he would have supported the application if all vehicles would be stored <br /> inside. Lindquist noted the applicant did not wish to be limited. Schroeder said <br /> economics necessitated the need for the applicant to sell late model cars as well. <br /> Mr. Katainan asked if Mr. Bury resubmitted his application later in the year, whether the <br /> Commission would consider it. Lindquist was informed that Katainan has reviewed the <br /> list of permitted uses. Lindquist said the possibility was there to add to that list. He <br /> suggested Katainan speak with staff regarding how a use might fit into one of the <br /> permitted categories. A public hearing would be required to amend the ordinance. <br /> Katainan said he would not want to pursue it if the probability of approval was narrow. <br /> He was informed that the process requires at least two-three months. Katainan <br /> volunteered to assist in the review of the permitted uses. He was informed that he should <br /> allow enough time for the process to be completed if another application is submitted. <br /> • (#17) #2333 AN AMENDMENT TO THE SECTION 5.40, LICENSING OF THE <br /> MUNICIPAL CODE OF ORDINANCES,AND SECTION 10.02, DEFINITIONS, <br /> AND SECTION 10.20, SUBD. 4, ACCESSORY USES, TO DEFINE HOME <br /> OCCUPATIONS AND ESTABLISH REGULATIONS - 11:24-11:38 P.M. <br /> The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. <br /> Van Zomeren reported that the draft ordinance regarding home occupations is based on <br /> work sessions held by the Planning Commission. She received information from City <br /> Attorney Barrett regarding firearm dealers for their review. The 1985 legislature removed <br /> from municipalities the ability to govern the sale of firearms. It was reinstated in 1993 and <br /> can be addressed in the zoning ordinance limiting the location of firearms dealers. A list of <br /> licensees was provided to the Commission. <br /> Van Zomeren reviewed the definition of home occupations, the accessory use, employees, <br /> exterior alterations, interior alterations, enclosed areas and accessory structures, outdoor <br /> storage, noise parking, signage, equipment and machinery, retail sales, visibility, hours of <br /> operation, customer traffic, deliveries, hazardous materials, home parties, prohibited <br /> occupations, disability provision, and enforcement as noted in the information packet. The <br /> amendment also eliminates the licensing provision for home occupation. Violations have <br /> not yet been addressed by the City Attorney. Included in the information is the text of the <br /> ordinance draft and minutes from prior meetings where the topic was discussed. <br /> • <br /> 29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.