Laserfiche WebLink
A <br />City of ORONO <br />�1 <br />RESOLUTION OF 7HE CITY COUNCIL ' <br />NO. <br />the proposed new building site and the site with existing <br />residence are similar in area to other common - ownership lots which <br />ha%e been approved as building sites since 1984 within the LR -lB <br />zoning district as follows: <br />8. ':he lots were created in the early 50's prior to the City's <br />adoption of ordinances that would have provided standards for the <br />development of lets. <br />S. The applicants have owned the lots for approximately 30 year. . <br />10. Lot 1 contains no accessory structures and would a.peEir to sere <br />merely as additional area receiving Inln7:-nal rnaintenarice. <br />11. Glenn Cook, the City Engineer, in a report dated October 6, 1981 <br />states the following: <br />Development of Lot 1 on Kelly Avenue will not result in any <br />drainage problems for adjacent resident. <br />':hc• run -off :rom the neighborhood is currently directed ;-o <br />City cwner', property South of Lot 1. Development of this, lot w i1 <br />rc: :ult in .additional run -off to the lake because cf an increa,�c• <br />in harCcover. Ivie do not anticipate that this increase in run -of f <br />will cause any significant adverse effect on the iake. <br />12. Tt.e City Council has considered this application in.�- Iuciinrj <br />reports Ly City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of th(_ <br />proposedl variances on the health, safety and welfare of tt:e corur,unity. <br />1 3 The Ci -y Council fir.9s that the conditions _xist-ing on this <br />property are Lc-cu Iiar to it and do not apply generally to other <br />property in this: zoning district; that granting the variances would <br />not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air. nor E)os(_ a fire <br />hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would net rr.ereiy serve <br />as a convenience to the applicant, but _ . necessary to alleviate a <br />c:emonstrai,le hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a <br />� ;jlj;tantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping <br />.j! t�: the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan <br />1.,2 City. <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />11-- nest.ead <br />Vacant <br />Lot <br />Lot <br />#830 <br />Smiley, 2720 Pheasant Road <br />.65 <br />.59 <br />#1051 <br />Gicsne, 1475 Cherry Place <br />.68 <br />.64 <br />#1084 <br />Maxfield, 4175 North Shore Drive <br />.57 <br />.46 <br />#'.24 <br />Lange, 4160 Forest Lake Drive <br />.40 <br />.45 <br />8. ':he lots were created in the early 50's prior to the City's <br />adoption of ordinances that would have provided standards for the <br />development of lets. <br />S. The applicants have owned the lots for approximately 30 year. . <br />10. Lot 1 contains no accessory structures and would a.peEir to sere <br />merely as additional area receiving Inln7:-nal rnaintenarice. <br />11. Glenn Cook, the City Engineer, in a report dated October 6, 1981 <br />states the following: <br />Development of Lot 1 on Kelly Avenue will not result in any <br />drainage problems for adjacent resident. <br />':hc• run -off :rom the neighborhood is currently directed ;-o <br />City cwner', property South of Lot 1. Development of this, lot w i1 <br />rc: :ult in .additional run -off to the lake because cf an increa,�c• <br />in harCcover. Ivie do not anticipate that this increase in run -of f <br />will cause any significant adverse effect on the iake. <br />12. Tt.e City Council has considered this application in.�- Iuciinrj <br />reports Ly City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of th(_ <br />proposedl variances on the health, safety and welfare of tt:e corur,unity. <br />1 3 The Ci -y Council fir.9s that the conditions _xist-ing on this <br />property are Lc-cu Iiar to it and do not apply generally to other <br />property in this: zoning district; that granting the variances would <br />not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air. nor E)os(_ a fire <br />hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would net rr.ereiy serve <br />as a convenience to the applicant, but _ . necessary to alleviate a <br />c:emonstrai,le hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a <br />� ;jlj;tantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping <br />.j! t�: the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan <br />1.,2 City. <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />