My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-15-1997 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
09-15-1997 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2019 2:36:14 PM
Creation date
7/10/2019 2:36:12 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
View images
View plain text
• ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 15, 1997 <br />( #2 - #2293 LGA Investment Group - Continued) <br />Stoddard while noting what building is allowed making sense to minimize the number of lots, he <br />does not see enough to substantiate changing the Comprehensive Plan or MUSA boundary. <br />Hawn agreed with Stoddard. She indicating changing the MUSA boundary is against the purposes <br />of the Comprehensive Plan. <br />Smith agreed. She noted, however, that if the property is developed, drainage and runoff will have <br />to be reviewed. <br />McMillan also agreed. <br />Berg indicated if the property was developed within the guidelines of the Comprehensive Plan, 13 <br />lots could be considered but may not be prudent. She suggested the design be such as to not impact <br />the area. <br />Schroeder agreed. <br />• Schroeder moved, Smith seconded, to deny the Comprehensive Plan revision/MUSA expansion <br />aspect of Application #2293 based on the fact it does not meet the guidelines laid out in the <br />Comprehensive Plan. <br />Gaffron indicated there were two phases of the application. By making the above motion, another <br />proposal may be submitted. Smith questioned whether it would be best to table the application. <br />Gaffron disagreed unless there is a plan that would convince the Planning Commission that the <br />Comprehensive Plan should be amended. Schroeder noted the problem with setting a precedent. <br />Gaffron suggested taking action on the motion and tabling the subdivision portion of the request. <br />Vote: Ayes 7, Nays 0. <br />Lindquist moved, Smith seconded, to deny rezoning the property. Vote: Ayes 7, Nays 0. <br />Lindquist moved, McMillan seconded, to table Application #2294 for street vacation and <br />subdivision. Vote: Ayes 7, Nays 0. <br />Lindquist noted there will be a request for an EIS in the future. Waters said an engineering study <br />would be conducted and not an EIS for drainage. Berg suggested Waters speak with the neighbors. <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).