My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-18-1997 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1997
>
08-18-1997 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2019 2:34:06 PM
Creation date
7/10/2019 2:34:05 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 18, 1997 <br />•(#11 - #2278 Patrick Middleton - Continued) <br />Van Zomeren reported that the plan was to originally remove the deck and redesign it for <br />more sunlight into the lower level. The survev was shown. The variances reauired <br />include side yard, 75 -250' hardcover, average lakeshore setback, and Lakeshore setback. <br />The new deck would further encroach into the 75' setback and average lakeshore setback <br />than the existing deck. The 75 -25Y hardcover currently exists at 48.61% and proposed at <br />40 170/. whprP 7.5 0/a is allnwM <br />Middleton said the stairs and Landing are included in the encroachment. Van Zomeren <br />indicated that the hardcover calculations must be verified. Schroeder asked if the surveyor <br />was asked to calculate the hardcover. Middleton said it was based on calculations <br />provided by Van Zomeren. Van Zomeren said she thought the survev had been redrawn <br />and deck measured. <br />Lindquist noted that hardcover is being eliminated. He indicated there is a drainage issue <br />concern. Lindquist felt there is a problem with the deck location being only 6 from the <br />side yard and into the 75' setback. He indicated he would like to see the correct hardcover <br />calculations as well. Van Zomeren clarified the problem with the surveyor. Lindauist said <br />the drainage runs down the lot, affecting the neighbor as well, running under the deck and <br />m,igt he widrevgM <br />• Woodruff indicated that new retaining walls will be built to address the problem. <br />Lindquist asked where the water will go. Woodruff said the water will run over the walls <br />noting the water flow could not change. Lindquist said he would like the City Engineer to <br />review the plan and determine a long range solution. He also indicated that he has not <br />seen any plan on how the boulder walls will be built. Van Zomeren said this would be <br />required for the building permit. <br />• <br />Lindquist asked what hardcover will be removed. Middleton said the cement patio will be <br />removed. A total of 740 s.f + hardcover will be removed. Woodruff received <br />confirmation of agreement with replacement of grass for hardcover by Lindquist. <br />Lindquist asked to see the whole plan. Woodruff noted that these issues were not <br />previously mentioned. <br />Middleton indicated that the drawing does not show where the stairway is located. The <br />deck as drawn comes inside the stairway. Woodruff said the survev included all stairways <br />and sidewalks. Van Zomeren asked if the survey was certified. Woodruff said he believed <br />it was certified. Lindquist asked to see the survey reporting he has not seen it. Hawn <br />clarified that the steps are closer than the proposed deck. Middleton said they were and <br />were close to the lot line noting the hardcover being removed. <br />24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.