Laserfiche WebLink
• ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR JULY 219 1997 <br />( #21 - #2272 Wyatt Moe - Continued) <br />the lots where the lot line should be drawn. He asked what the Commission directed as far as <br />hardcover. <br />Lindquist said the hardcover noted should be satisfactory. He would like to see lots closer to <br />equal size. <br />Hawn said angling of the lot line should be satisfactory and did not believe the shoreline should <br />have to be changed. <br />Schroeder asked if the applicant would end up having more hardcover. Gaffron indicated that <br />other lots in the area average more than 25% hardcover. <br />Schroeder questioned whether the cabin lot would be considered new construction. Huff said it <br />would but the lot was two times the average size. Hawn was informed by Hurr that the side yard <br />requirements would be met. Variances for lot area, width, and hardcover would be required. <br />The hardcover would be at about 35 %. Lindquist thought the plans showed good progress for <br />• the property. <br />Mrs. Moe said they would like to build this fall and asked how the vacation would affect this <br />time frame. She was informed that application for vacation was required and the application <br />amended, which could be before the Planning Commission in August with review of the lot line <br />rearrangement. Approvals could be received at that time for variances, vacation and lot line <br />rearrangement for Council review at their August 25 meeting. The earliest time frame for <br />receiving building approval would be September. <br />Huff indicated that the property is handling the drainage. She also noted that the applicant is <br />aware of the sewer lines. <br />McMillan was informed by Gaffron that the vacation would be a separate hearing but can be <br />done together with the park vacation. He indicated that the attractiveness of the application is the <br />vacation and rededication over the actual roadway. <br />Dave and Linda Walker, who live south of the Moe's, said they are in support of trading of the <br />land as they are currently cut off from Loma Linda and virtually landlocked. <br />Schroeder moved, Lindquist seconded, to table Application #2272 per Staff recommendation. <br />Vote: Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br />• <br />34 <br />