Laserfiche WebLink
. ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR JULY 219 1997 <br />( #18 - #2269 Conley Brooks and Gerald McCourtney - Continued) <br />Gaffron reported that the application is for a lot line rearrangement for property on West <br />Ferndale Road. The existing substandard lot is proposed to be divided and attached to two <br />adjacent properties. Gaffron reviewed the division. The property at 1045 Ferndale Road West <br />(lots 11 and 12) with an existing house will be split, with a portion added to the McCourtney <br />property to the west and the remainder to the Brooks property to the north across the road. The <br />house at 1045 will be removed. The portion of 1045 north of the road, Parcels H and E, will be <br />combined with Parcels A and F. <br />Gaffron noted potential difficulties identified by the submitted survey, including the separation <br />of Parcel C from 905 West Ferndale. He said this would have to be considered under a separate <br />application. Gaffron did not know whether it had been used for hardcover calculations for 905. <br />He indicated that there are docks on the small property (Parcel B) not shown on the plat maps <br />and it is not known what properties they serve. He noted there are discrepancies between the <br />survey submitted and the County plat maps. <br />Gaffron said the proposal adds lakeshore to property currently not having lakeshore. He <br />is indicated that a "Special Lot Combination" can be required if combination of two lots separated <br />by the road is not allowed by the County. It would then require City approval to sell the <br />combined parcels separately. Gaffron said staff recommends approval of the subdivision with <br />recombination of parcels as proposed. <br />The applicant was questioned regarding his intent for the existing garage noting the existing <br />residence would be removed. McCourtney said the garage is already located there, and he <br />intends to replace it. He indicated he would probably need other variances to do so. He asked if <br />he would be compromising his position if he removes the garage now for reconstruction later. <br />Lindquist said he would be in a better position if he left the garage in place for the time being. <br />The other Commissioners agreed. McCourtney said he would come back before the Planning <br />Commission with his plans in the near future. <br />Gaffron said he would recommend removal but the applicant has the prerogative to keep it in <br />place. He noted that the garage encroaches into the right -of -way and is in a dilapidated condition <br />and would have to be removed at some point. He agreed that the applicant is better off leaving it <br />in place for the time being. Lindquist noted that the setbacks would then be known. <br />During public comments, a gentleman said he represented Robert Floyd, the owner of 960 <br />Ferndale. He asked what the criteria is for allowing a property to subdivide for greater access to <br />the lake and how it reflects on the future for other property owners. Lindquist said the <br />• Commission reviews the applications case by case. <br />27 <br />