My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-16-1997 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1997
>
06-16-1997 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2019 2:31:00 PM
Creation date
7/10/2019 2:30:59 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON R NE 16, 1997 <br />• <br />(UTA U Il T ud - Contir.ued) <br />' � YF lE <br />Gaffron noted that during the earlier review, it was suggested there may be only two <br />additional lots instead of three. That review did not reflect the septic site used for the <br />existing house. Recommendations had been made to eliminate the narrow driveway and <br />the back lot. He presented a sketch of how two additional lots might be oriented. He <br />noted all lots would abut the road but require a width variance at the cul -de -sac. He <br />questioned whether access to the house could be accomplished across the pond. Gaffron <br />suggested a roadway with cul -de -sac would impact the neighbor as well as impacting the <br />rural feel, hence, this sketch might not be practical. <br />Smith noted the attempt in balancing the needs questioning the cul -de -sac and use of <br />existing driveway. She noted that there may only be two additional lots. Gaffron agreed <br />that this may be the case with the existing residential lot and two additional lots. Mrs, <br />Whitehead reported that they currently have two separate tax parcels. <br />Mrs. Whitehead indicated that the reason for abandoning the project before was due to a <br />heavy work load. They are now pursuing the issue as they are being relocated. She said <br />they would like to create a development with the least amount of impact maintaining the <br />park atmosphere. Whitehead said they do not want to impact the existing house. She <br />noted the property is heavily wooded. <br />• codes in 1991 in order to resent a plan that would be <br />Whitehead said they reviewed the p <br />in compliance. She said all lots would have two septic sites (designed for 5 bedroom <br />homes), two acre dry buildable, and meet required setbacks. <br />Lindquist was informed by Mrs. Whitehead that they preferred the road being improved <br />without adding a cul -de -sac. She felt the road could come up around on the west side and <br />include a driveway. <br />Mrs. Whitehead suggested that the focus had been on Lyman Avenue previously. With <br />the plans approved for Highway 12, Whitehead suggested a cul -de -sac could be placed on <br />the property further back that will be taken for Highway 12, <br />is <br />It was noted that McMillan lives in the neighborhood as does Smith. <br />Whitehead said their home was the second one built on the road, but they are facing <br />consequences from being the last to develop their property. <br />Schroeder indicated that there is an issue of the road serving_ the number of lots. <br />Whitehead said one property was subdivided into three lots. <br />24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.