Laserfiche WebLink
is <br />MINUTES OF TjjE ORONO <br />6, lOMWSS1014 <br />MEETING HELD ON <br />n- s,.c140 Jim F'i'c[LCiJ SketCdl. Plan -- C17FilY!lididJ <br />Smith questioned what "undisturbed areas" were and how they would be controlled. <br />Waters said this could be done through conservation easement, association regulations, <br />covenants, depending on the level of restriction desired. Smith said she would not want to <br />see ball fields or uses that would deviate from the open space concept. Lindquist said the <br />controls could make, that deter-mination. Smith_ said other appliPations where. such <br />intentions were made resulted in other uses. She requested controls be placed that would <br />maintain the open space. <br />Lindquist received confirmation from Waters that he would meet with the Council and the <br />homeowners in the area. Gaffron asked for clearer direction regarding MUSA, zoning, <br />clustering, noting the Park Commission's review indicated requesting park fee or land <br />would depend on the plan. <br />Lindquist said he preferred all of the property be within the MUSA under a PRD. <br />McMillan questioned whether accessory structures should be allowed. Schroeder <br />indicatred that two acre zoning with sewering could accommodate accessory structures. <br />If a PRD was »se.d, the City could innsist nn Covenants. f affrnn said the developer could <br />be asked to restrict the use in the PRD. <br />• <br />Schroeder said he, preferred the, property all tip within the 1Vl(lS q use of clustering <br />concept at a density level less than 19 lots (preferring 14 or 15 maximum), trails tied in to <br />the surrounding area, noting sketch plan 3 as the preferred plan. <br />Smith said she agreed with the comments made by Schroeder and Lindquist. Asa second <br />choice, Smith said she would recommend all lots be 2 -acre zoning with both MUSA and <br />non -MUSA. She would like to see controls placed on the open spaces, undisturbed areas, <br />outlot, and stormwater pond. <br />Schroeder questioned whether the 1 acre lots could be required to be changed to 2 acres. <br />Gaffron said such a "downzoning" might create potential problems, getting into the issue <br />of a "taking ". <br />Stoddard said he. preferred all lots be within MT1SA with sketch plan 3 preferred with one. <br />acre minimum lot size. He supported sketch plan 1 if all were within the MUSA at general <br />1.5 acre lots sizes. Stoddard said he appreciates the clustering concept. <br />Ga fron noted that the Council will review the sketch plan at their upcoming meeting. <br />22 <br />