My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-19-1997 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
05-19-1997 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2019 2:29:28 PM
Creation date
7/10/2019 2:29:27 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />MEV4UTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON MAY 19, 1997 <br />( 92 - Telecommunications Ordinance - Continued) <br />Schroeder informed her that this was not necessarily true. He said he felt the water towers <br />would be adequate for antennas for the time being. He also indicated other communities <br />could provide the service. <br />McMillan asked if any assessment has been made of the water towers. Van Zomeren <br />indicated that while no analysis has been made, the consultant was aware of the height and <br />location of the water antennas. Gappa said the consultant based his use recommendation <br />on data indicating the four mile distance separation between the water towers and on areas <br />of heavy telecommunication usage and high topography. Gappa said, while the structures <br />were not personally reviewed, there was no reason to believe antennas would not operate <br />from these locations. McMillan noted that the City, which is primarily residential, is <br />concerned with the proper placement of antennas. <br />Steve Mangold, US West Wireless, 426 North Fairview, St. Paul, said his company has a <br />central office located south of the water tower by City Offices. A switch has been located <br />there since the 1950's, which will provide for PCS services to Orono, Wayzata, Long <br />Lake, and Spring Park. This switching station is an extension of their business and <br />service, and Mangold was of the opinion that the location for providing such service <br />should be from this central office of US West. Mangold indicated that all calls come <br />• through this switch regardless of the company. He said it is a secure location with <br />adequate protection from major calamities. Mangold said he would like to work with the <br />City. He would like to see a co- location pole on the switch station for overflow. He <br />indicated his company does not anticipate further growth until later in the year. <br />• <br />Van Zomeren inquired of Mangold how tall the tower would be required. Mangold said <br />90 -120' depending on co- location. He indicated that drive tests have not been completed. <br />McMillan inquired what the zoning was for the switch station. Gaffron indicated B -1. <br />Ron Gunderson, Sprint, said he is in favor of the ordinance with the caveat that the City <br />would be willing to enter into further discussion in the future. He felt the ordinance would <br />not provide for all carriers. He noted other communities which he has worked with <br />regarding this issue and where antennas are allowed. He indicated that Sprint will be <br />requesting location on the City Offices water tower. <br />Smith noted that the industry is in the current stage of locating towers for antennas. Van <br />Zomeren said the FCC has auctioned off licenses; A and B licenses were sold in the early <br />1990's and C, D, and E licenses were recently made available. She noted it would be a <br />violation of the anti -trust law to master plan locations and grid the City for best locations; <br />co- location may occur on a site -by -site basis but companies may not work together. <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.