Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON MAY 19, 1997 <br />( #14 - #2238 Chic Dwight and Fred Guttormson - Continued) <br />Schroeder was informed that Guttormson has owned the property for three years. <br />Smith questioned why the original resolution was not signed and the gravel was not <br />removed. Guttormson said he parks his motor home on the gravel driveway but would <br />have removed it if the enclosure was made permanent. <br />Lindquist asked if the applicant intends to finish the enclosure and remove the gravel <br />driveway noting the need for a building permit. Guttormson said he would if allowed. He <br />would also remove the driveway and reseed to the lakeshore. <br />Lindquist inquired if the lakeshore deck would be removed. Smith noted it was a <br />condition of the prior resolution. The applicant stated he did not complete the proposed <br />improvements and would Iike to maintain the deck. <br />Hawn suggested removal and sodding of the loop portion of the driveway with a back -out <br />area behind the garage. <br />The parking location of the RV was discussed. The applicant said the garage doors would <br />have to be heightened. He would prefer to park the RV in the loop of the driveway. <br />• Lindquist informed Guttormson that the intention is to eliminate hardcover in the 0 -75' <br />setback. Guttormson said he would store the RV elsewhere during the winter months but <br />park it on the property the two weeks each month that it was not being used. <br />Smith inquired of the time frame if the applicant were to remove the driveway to the lake. <br />The applicant said he would request 60 days. <br />There were no public comments. <br />Smith moved, Schroeder seconded, to approve Application #2238 subject to Staff <br />recommendation #1, elimination of the loop driveway in the 0 -75' setback noting sufficient <br />spacing for a turnaround elsewhere, conditions #2 and #3. <br />Guttormson said he would like to remove the proposal for the garage and maintain the <br />loop driveway. Guttormson was informed that he could present that request to the <br />Council. Gaffron indicated the garage request could be removed from the application. <br />Smith moved, Schroeder seconded, to eliminate the loop, with conditions 1, 2, 3, and 4. <br />If the applicant chooses to eliminate condition #4, a permit would be required to <br />reconstruct the garage. <br />• The applicant said he wanted to maintain the loop driveway. <br />19 <br />