Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON MAY 19, 1997 <br />( #11 - #2235 Martin Schneider - Continued) <br />Smith asked what the building inspector required. Van Zomeren said the building would <br />require interior steps and a fire escape under the B2, which is not as extensive as the <br />requirements under the E -2. <br />Lindquist noted that the applicant questioned the classification change from B2 to E2. <br />Schneider asked the Commission to proceed with the application as recommended, and he <br />would work with the building inspector. Smith informed him that if the building was <br />classified E2, there would be areas where compliance with regulations would be required. <br />Schneider said he did not know if he could make those improvements and might possibly <br />have to sell the property. The tank and heated building for the tank would be prohibitively <br />expensive. <br />During public comments, Van Erickson informed the Commission that the building is old <br />and felt the number of fire exits was adequate for safety. He did not believe the building <br />should be required to have a sprinkler system. <br />There were no additional comments. <br />Lindquist asked the applicant if he had reviewed the recommendation and conditions. <br />• Schneider said he had some disagreement but asked the Commission to move forward, <br />and he would work to resolve those issues. <br />Berg inquired of Schneider if the issue was the code or occupancy. Schneider said it was <br />the code as it changed the occupancy. Van Zomeren said the change to the CUP triggers <br />the need for an amendment regarding occupancy and building codes. <br />A member of the Lake Minnetonka Environmental School Board asked that the certificate <br />of occupancy be supplied without all of the work completed as parents of the children will <br />be performing some of the required work. Lindquist informed her that the Planning <br />Commission does not have this authority, and the matter would have to be taken up with <br />the Building Inspector. Van Zomeren indicated that it was a liability issue. <br />Sherokee Ilse asked if this request was not possible, if the school could hold open houses. <br />Lindquist again related that the Commission does not have the authority to waive Building <br />Code requirements. Smith indicated that the interpretation of the code would be by the <br />State. Schneider disagreed in that he felt the issue was the adult versus children <br />occupancy. He believed the issue will have to be reviewed by the City Attorney. He <br />informed Stoddard that the recommendation could be subject to building codes. <br />Schroeder said he was in support of the use itself He asked if there were any significant <br />changes to hours or otherwise. Schneider said there would be no change to hours and <br />• people in attendance. <br />15 <br />