My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-21-1997 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
04-21-1997 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2019 2:28:27 PM
Creation date
7/10/2019 2:28:26 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMM%SSION <br />MEETING HELD ON APRIL 21, 1997 <br />( #5 - #2217 John Thimmesh - Continued) <br />Discussion at the last meeting involved concern that a future homeowner may add <br />blacktop. Existing hardcover in the 75 -250' setback is 26.15 %. It is proposed at 29.40% <br />for a 4.4% variance. Van Zomeren indicated the applicant would also like to maintain the <br />shed. She noted the existing structural coverage is in conformance at 14.4 %. The <br />addition will increase the coverage to 16.91% requiring a 1.9% variance. Removal of the <br />shed would reduce that figure to 15.5 %. Van Zomeren said no permit was required when <br />the shed was built. The shed does encroach the rear and side yards. There is no impact <br />on the neighboring property but it does increase the hardcover. Van Zomeren said Staff <br />prefers that storager areas be consolidated in one location. A 3.3' rear yard variance is <br />also required. <br />Mr. Thimmesh said he would prefer to keep the shed. He noted the shed's exterior <br />matches that of the residence and is surrounded by a 6' fence. It is used for pool <br />equipment and is in a convenient location according to Mrs. Thimmesh. Lindquist <br />indicated the need to correct problems when the opportunity arises. <br />There were no public comments. <br />Van Zomeren suggested negotiating with the applicant regarding the 33 rear yard <br />• encroachment. Thimmesh indicated shortening the addition would result in a lack of <br />proportion. <br />Hawn, Schroeder, and Smith agreed that the structural coverage should be reduced by the <br />removal of the shed. The applicant agreed to remove the shed. <br />Schroeder moved, Berg seconded, to approve Application #2217 with the condition that <br />the shed be removed when the addition is completed. Vote: Ayes 7, Nays 0. <br />(#b) #2221 SVEN A. WASBERG AND ARLENE DECANDIA, 3115 NORTH <br />SHORE DRIVE - VARIANCESICONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - <br />CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING 8:37-8:58 P.M. <br />The Applicant was present. <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.