Laserfiche WebLink
0 <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON APRIL 21, 1997 <br />( #3 - #2205 Allen Scheffers - Continued) <br />Lindquist moved, Schroeder seconded, to approve Application #2205 with conditions 1 <br />and 2 as noted. The applicant is to work with Staff regarding the creation of a natural <br />looking pond. Vote: Ayes 7, Nays 0. <br />(#4) #2214 CARMEN AND RICHARD KOZICKY, 2016 SHADYWOOD ROAD - <br />VARIANCES - CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING 7:5 8-8:24 P.M. <br />The Applicant was present. <br />Van Zomeren reported that the application had been tabled to allow recalculation of the <br />numbers. The applicant has submitted a revised site plan. She noted Staff met on site <br />with applicant and the County. The County approves the location due to sight lines and <br />curb cuts. The plan is considered an improvement. By switching locations of the porch <br />and deck, they are now located outside of the average lakeshore setback. Steps are <br />allowed within that setback. Van Zomeren noted that the adjoining properties have decks <br />located ahead of the average lakeshore setback as well as more hardcover than that of the <br />applicant. <br />Van Zomeren indicated the proposal will result in a reduction of hardcover in the 0 -75' <br />• setback. A structural coverage variance will be required. Allowed is 15% or 2058 s.f. <br />The residence exists at 1948 s.f. or 14.2 %. The proposed structure is 2837 s.f. or <br />20.67 1/o. It was noted that the 3' overhang is consistent with the design of the residence <br />but results in the need for a side yard variance. A hardcover variance in the 75 -250' <br />setback is also required. Van Zomeren said Staff recommends approval or amendment. <br />She recognized the improvement to the driveway and the reduction in the average <br />lakeshore setback. <br />The applicant had no comments. <br />There were no public comments. <br />Hawn said she is concerned with the excess structural coverage. She suggested the <br />garage dimensions be changed and pushed back on the lot. Kozicky noted a portion of the <br />garage is for laundry room and entry improvement. It was clarified that while the family <br />room and deck have been reduced in size, the deck had not been previously included in the <br />calculations. A deck located 6' above grade should be included in the calculations. <br />Schroeder asked how the structural coverage compares with other homes in the <br />neighborhood. Van Zomeren said the property currently has the least amount of <br />hardcover. The improvements would result in coverage similar to other homes. <br />• Acknowledgment letters signed by neighbors were noted. <br />6 <br />