Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON MARCH 31, 1997 <br />CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING <br />• SPRING HILL GOLF CLUB <br />Lindquist asked the applicant to comment on the Met Council's notations. Braman said <br />they are using the best management practices of the Met Council as well as those of the <br />MCWD. He also indicated that mitigation is at a 5:1 replacement ratio where 2:1 <br />replacement is required. He noted that all of the wetlands on the property have been <br />drained, and it is their attempt to restore them. <br />Crosby indicated that the applicants have not discussed and responded to the comments <br />yet received. Crosby said the MCWD's recommendations are a piece of the puzzle. He <br />indicated it is their attempt to replace the wetlands without leaving the site. Braman also <br />indicated that they are following the design criteria for NURP ponding as well as for the <br />100 year storm projections. Smith asked for further clarification on these issues. <br />• <br />McMillan inquired whether the MCWD is a commenting agent to the EAW. Paffron said <br />he believed that they were. Braman said the MCWD will respond in some manner and all <br />commenting agencies will receivo a response. <br />Lindquist indicated that comments will be received up through April 9, and t�e flaming <br />Commission would not be able to further review the application until these cornmegls have <br />been received. <br />Braman noted that the water quality issues have been studied previously by the MCWD. <br />Crosby asked the Commission to 1pok at the pig picture when considei jq the Parg§t�p <br />• issue. He noted that the R�p}t sg Is armjtted use and asked that t}}� ship'$ pe <br />9 <br />