02-18-1997 Planning Commission Minutes

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 18, 1997 ( #5 #2205 Elaine and Steve Silus - Continued) Steve Silus said they wished to maintain a one -story residence with basement in order to keep the height of the structure low and present an aesthetically pleasing structure. They also are attempting to save the hackberry tree. He noted the proposed deck does not extend any further forward towards the lake than the existing house. The proposed house would be farther back on the property. Silus said the garage by the street will be removed and the driveway will become more centered. He informed Stoddard that the deck will be cantilevered and have a railing. Hawn expressed concern about whether the tree could be saved. She suggested a tree expert review the plan. It was noted that there is presently no basement under the structure. If the tree cannot be saved, Hawn would like to see the structure moved back further on the lot. Hawn informed the applicant of the series of requests being made in the area by owners of substandard lots. The ordinances require that new construction meet the zoning requirements. Hawn is concerned with the proposed overage in structural coverage. Silus said their only other alternative is to build a two -story house, and they would prefer not to do so. • Smith said she agreeds with Hawn but sees the proposal as an improvement to the property. She requested that no additional improvements be allowed in the future. Hawn said she was concerned with setting a precedent. Schroeder asked the applicant if the structure would be reduced to maintain the 15% allowable in structural coverage. Silus said it was not feasible. He indicated that they attempted to reduce the hardcover and reviewed the structure with an architect. McMillan noted that while there is some improvement in hardcover, there is additional hardcover in the 75 -250' setback and an increase in structural coverage. She felt the proposal did not present a major improvement to the property but was more neutral in its changes from the existing structure. There were no public comments. McMillan asked if the proposal was reviewed with the neighbors. Silus said he discussed the plans with his neighbors. Van Zomeren said she was in receipt of acknowledgment letters from the neighbors. Schroeder asked if the 3 -car garage and driveway could be reduced. Silus felt the plan was proportionate.