My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-18-1996 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
11-18-1996 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2019 2:10:29 PM
Creation date
7/10/2019 2:10:27 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 18, 1996 <br />( #IA - #2197 John O'Sullivan and North Central CBA - Continued) <br />McMillan inquired when the determination would be made about the stormwater pond <br />size. Gafffron said it had originally been done but the City plan did not meet the <br />requirements of the MCWD. At this point, the proposed pond is only larger enough to <br />accommodate phase 1 of the project. Gaffron said discussions are ongoing. Lindquist <br />inquired when it would be resolved. Gaffron said the issue of the vacation is part of the <br />pond resolution. <br />O'Sullivan noted that he is still working with the church on the closure of the sale of the <br />property and has had three time extensions on the proposed purchase. He thought he <br />would be able to complete the vacation and conceptual site plan by this time. <br />Mabusth asked for review of the restrictions. Gaffron reported the following conditions <br />have been recommended by Staff: 1) The applicants shall legally combine the vacated <br />portions of right -of -way with their respective properties. This includes O'Sullivan and <br />Lafayette Ridge Homeowners Association. 2) All property owners benefiting from the <br />proposed vacation shall be responsible for executing the appropriate drainage, utility, <br />access and pedestrian/bike trail easements over the portions of right -of -way to be vacated. <br />The easements shall be filed at the time the vacation resolution is filed by the City <br />Attorney's office. 3) As part of the applicant's Phase 2 site planning, namely the church <br />• property, a trail corridor shall be reserved at a location acceptable to the City, which is <br />currently open to where it shall be located. 4) As part of the development of the church <br />site, the applicant shall submit a trail grading and construction plan to be approved by the <br />Park Commission and City Engineer, and shall grade the site accordingly to accommodate <br />future pavement of a trail. It has not yet been decided to what extent the applicant will <br />construct the trail. <br />C� <br />Stoddard questioned whether conditions 3 and 4 could be combined. Gaffron said the <br />options could be laid out but not become definitive without the Council's input. <br />Berg asked McDermott where the trail would begin. It was noted that the trail would <br />stop at CoRd 15 and people would use the roadway along CoRd 15. There are no plans <br />for a formal trail along CoRd 15. Feeder streets would be used. <br />Thompson reported that the site was maximized in its use. A shift of buildings to the <br />northeast would create more hardcover in the zones. He saw the trail creating a domino <br />effect on the site. He felt the best compromise would be a trail along the perimeter to <br />eliminate further compromising and intensification of what is now a borderline site. He <br />cited the problem with having a stormwater pond on site instead of allowing a <br />contribution. <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.