My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-18-1996 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
11-18-1996 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2019 2:10:29 PM
Creation date
7/10/2019 2:10:27 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 18, 1996 <br />• <br />( #11 - #2196 Genmar Industries - Continued) <br />McConnell responded to the suggestions made in 1989 and again by Chief Cheswick for a <br />tunnel or bridge. She noted that Hennepin County said a bridge was not feasible and a <br />tunnel would be a security risk. <br />Doug Schmitt noted the presence of Indian Mounds in the Orono area and questioned the <br />review by the State archaeologist. Mabusth reiterated the findings by the archaeologist of <br />a natural sight with no burial grounds. Gaffron read the letter written by the State <br />archaeologist. <br />Schmitt inquired about a cut into the land on the north side by this site that had been <br />stopped. Gaff-on said he did not know the history of that excavation, but it was quite <br />visible when standing on the north side of the bluff. <br />Schmitt asked if there would be any opportunity for more slips. Gaffron said the LMCD <br />has already provided a special density permit noting a marina must provide a number of <br />amenities. Gaffron indicated the number of slips is in direct correlation to the shoreline <br />footage and amenities provided, and is within the jurisdiction of the LMCD. He did note <br />that the Council may have an opinion as to whether additional slips might ever be <br />developed at this site. <br />is hmitt informed the Commission that he was concerned that another building such as a <br />Sc g <br />double wide mobile might be erected on the site. McConnell said they have no intention <br />to add a structure or additional slips. <br />Hawn said she was opposed to cutting into the bluff on the lakeshore. Smith agreed <br />noting the recommendation for denial by the DNR. McMillan and Berg also voiced their <br />opposition to cutting into the bluff. <br />Lindquist asked the applicant if a vote or tabling was preferred. The applicant asked for a <br />vote. <br />Lindquist moved, Smith seconded, to deny Application #2196. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />At Applicant's request, it was indicated that Applications 92195 and #2196 would be <br />presented together to the Council, probably at their first meeting in February, 1997. <br />SKETCH PLAN /CONCEPTUAL REVIEWS <br />( #12) #2190 JAMES G. FULLERTON, III., 3350/3400 FOX STREET - SKETCH <br />OF A FIVE LOT SUBDIVISION <br />. The applicant, John Winston, was present. <br />30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.