My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-21-1996 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
10-21-1996 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2019 2:08:56 PM
Creation date
7/10/2019 2:08:55 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 21, 1996 <br />( #3 - #2175 Frank and Susan Koubsky - Continued) <br />Mabusth advised that if the North Shore Drive access is no longer a problem for <br />applicants that they take time to explore their options before building garage addition at <br />north side of residence. <br />Schroeder suggested a time limit of 3 years. Koubsky asked for additional time to review <br />the options. Stoddard did note that they would have the time between this meeting and <br />the Council meeting to review the plans. Koubsky suggested the application be tabled. <br />Schroeder moved, Stoddard seconded, to table Application #2175 at the request of the <br />applicant to allow additional time to consider the length of time for the project and to <br />obtain cost estimates. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />( #4) #2176 DANIEL S. PERKINS, 55 LANDMARK DRIVE - RENEWAL OF <br />ANNUAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - 7 :05 -7:18 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. <br />The Applicant was present. <br />Mabusth reported that the renewal application proposes for removal of 200 cubic yards of <br />peat material from two wetland areas on applicant's property. Approval was granted for <br />the first removal from the smaller of the two ponds in 1995. This application is for the <br />second phase involving 200 cubic yards of peat removal for the winter 1996 -1997 season. <br />Mabusth noted that access would not be from either Landmark or Bayside but from the <br />Butterfield's property to the north as in the first application. <br />Schroeder read into the minutes a letter submitted by the applicant requesting an <br />amendment to the proposal for shorter periods of time to simplify the procedures from <br />every year renewal. Mabusth questioned whether this would involve a change in the <br />amount of removal. Perkins said the amount of 200 cubic yards would not be changed as <br />this has been determined to be the amount that is usable in the time period. Applicant <br />wishes to amend the current proposal to 200 cubic yards each year for a five year period. <br />Perkins said he would reapply if a change is required. He noted that in the past two years, <br />only one digging took place. <br />McMillan inquired how many dump trucks was needed to remove the fill. Perkins said <br />two different sized trucks are used, and the removal is completed in one day. McMillan <br />also inquired if he crosses the Luce Line trail. Perkins said that the Luce Line was crossed <br />and Butterfield has property on north side of the Luce Line and is allowed to mine peat on <br />his own property through a permit gained from the DNR. Butterfield has legal access <br />• over Luce Line. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.