10-21-1996 Planning Commission Minutes

Home Browse Search

• MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 21, 1996 ( #8 - #2182 Herbert Terry Olson - Continued) Mabusth said the Olsons would like to locate the garage at the 9' street setback. The Staff was concerned and had the Engineer review it finding that two tiers of retaining walls will not fit in the existing elevation with the location of the private sewer line. There is also concern over backing out into the County roadway, especially in light of the steep elevations to immediate west. Mabusth said they also looked at the drive coming in from the east (Stubbs Bay Road). When asked to comment by Schroeder, Olson said they have lived there for 20 years and have adjusted to where the garage is located and prefer that location. Olson said the slope and landscape is a big consideration, and they like the look of it as it now stands. McMillan asked about a concern with the garage being at the same elevation of the house and blocking the view. Olson said the prime view is to the south. She noted, if the Commissioners were concerned, guests, service, and emergency vehicles use the long driveway. During a recent remodel, the driveway was used to remove debris and access the home, which would not happen if the garage was relocated to the end of the driveway. McMillan asked Olson to consider the garage being tucked into the northwest area of the property adding that she understands there is a slope but there is one by the garage now. Olson said in front of the current garage, it is level now, and would have to excavate around it. Mabusth said the excavation would be close to 8' with 4' at the first tier of retaining walls, and then another 4'. Mabusth also said there is concern with drainage and not having enough room, and the possibility of relocating the sewer line. Hawn asked about shoveling of the steps in the winter time. Olson said it was hard but she is used to it. Hawn noted this would not be the case if the garage was near the driveway, but Olson said the driveway was long. Stoddard asked why a CUP was required. Mabusth explained that it was due to the lot being a through lot requiring a 50' setback at both the front and rear setback lines. She noted that the lot being a corner lot also creates a hardship for the Olsons. Schroeder asked Olson if she understood that the sewer line would have to be relocated. Olson said she did but would rather relocate the sewer line than relocate the garage. Mrs. Olson asked if she was unable to move the garage, what requirements would be involved in repairing the garage. Mabusth said the garage was non - conforming and needs major repair which requires a variance. Mabusth added that the garage roof also needs replacement. Olson said the rebuilt garage would not serve as a retaining wall for the bank. Olson said when the property was sold, the house would probably be taken down. Mabusth asked Olson if she found the garage to be convenient. Olson said it was very convenient. 13