Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 16, 1996 <br />0 ( #2 - Zoning Amendment - Continued) <br />Hawn noted that there was no particular danger leaving the zoning as it currently stands in <br />that the issue of drive -thru restaurants was a conditional use and would require review, <br />while tobacco shops were a permitted use. She noted that the off - street parking relates to <br />all of the zones. <br />Callahan responded that the off - street parking for the most part required a business to be <br />on the property. He said he did not understand the need for the permitted use, citing off - <br />premise parking being permitted at the Art Center for the nearby marina. Gaffron said all <br />of the parking code sections would be reviewed. <br />Lindquist asked Gaffron to review the B -6. Gaffron indicated the B -6 revision would <br />affect one item only. The B -6 includes office, banks, libraries, motels, and Class 1 <br />restaurants (sit -down type). All drive -thru type uses are conditional uses. The committee <br />suggested that a drive -thru bank would be acceptable but a drive -thru restaurant would <br />lend itself to more options including fast food. The Committee suggested drive -thru <br />restaurants be eliminated. <br />Schroeder questioned why this use should be eliminated and inquired if the level of traffic <br />was a factor. Gaffron said there were a number of reasons, one of which could be the lack <br />• of wanting a fast food restaurant along Hwy 12. Gaffron said it does not mean fast food <br />restaurants are bad, but reasons should be defined as to why this conditional use would <br />not be permitted. Lindquist said the committee decided that eliminating the conditional <br />use would eliminate future requests for such uses. Schroeder was informed by Gaffron <br />that the B -6 zoning along Hwy 12 only involves the Otten properties and potentially the <br />Willow to Old Crystal Bay Road area on the north. <br />Lindquist asked if there were any public comments. <br />John O'Sullivan asked if the reason behind the proposed change to the B -6 was fast -food <br />restaurants or the drive -thru itself. He noted another city eliminating fast food restaurants <br />and the change precluded the use by businesses that might have been desirable. O'Sullivan <br />said there were certain types of dining that emphasized take out food, and the elimination <br />of drive -thrus would hinder this application, citing examples of LeeAnn Chins, Culver's, <br />and others. O'Sullivan said if eliminating fast food restaurants was the goal, maybe the <br />definition of fast food needs to be determined. <br />Stoddard said O'Sullivan made a good point in that the Commission cannot change life <br />styles. Stoddard suggested retaining the conditional use as only two areas are affected and <br />a reason of lack of accommodating the traffic could be a factor in future applications. <br />Stoddard asked if the areas could not handle the traffic. Gaffron said traffic was not <br />necessarily an issue. <br />4 <br />