My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-15-1996 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
07-15-1996 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2019 2:06:49 PM
Creation date
7/10/2019 2:06:48 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON JULY 15, 1996 <br />•( #3 - #2135 Paul and Sue Hedlund/Edna Albee Estate - Continued) <br />Lindquist moved, Stoddard seconded, to approve Application #2135 with the <br />understanding that a grading plan for the bluff area be presented prior to the application <br />going before the Council. A minimum of a 1500 -2000 gallon tank would be required for <br />pumping and the drainfield would be disconnected. Variances for a street setback of 8', <br />hardcover, and average lakeshore setback were recommended. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 1, <br />Peterson (to be consistent with his policy to vote against average lakeshore setback <br />variances). Peterson noted the improvements made to the plan and said the proposal is <br />consistent with the other homes in the neighborhood. The application will be presented at <br />the August 12 Council meeting. <br />( #4) #2148 WAYNE M. HOLMES AND JACKIE DAHL, 1390 PARK DRIVE - <br />VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING 7:54 -7:59 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. <br />The applicants was present. <br />Mabusth reported that their original proposal was to restore the majority of the house and <br />add a new second story. The applicants found that the foundation would not support the <br />• new second story and now propose to raze the structure and install a new residence. The <br />property is located in the 1 acre zoning district. The lot width is met as well as all <br />setbacks. A lot area variance is required. No negative comments have been received from <br />any neighboring property owners. <br />Peterson saw the application in the light of a formality due to code restrictions. He did <br />voice concern over a cistern on the property and asked that it's removal or abandonment <br />be attached as a condition of the application. The existing well is to be relocated, and the <br />existing well will need to be abandoned. <br />There were no public comments. <br />Mabusth noted that the applicant's have asked to have the application presented at the July <br />22 Council meeting. <br />Peterson moved, Berg seconded, to approve Application #2148 with the addition of the <br />removal of the cistern and existing well. Vote: Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br />�J <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.