My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-15-1996 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
07-15-1996 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2019 2:06:49 PM
Creation date
7/10/2019 2:06:48 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON JULY 15, 1996 <br />( #9 - 92154 John O'Sullivan/Erwin Smith - Continued) <br />O'Sullivan said he cannot move any farther forward without the rezoning. He <br />acknowledged that other developers would come forward at some future point but noted <br />the comprehensive plan's call for encouragement of private unification and coordinated <br />projects. O'Sullivan said the property could remain as it is, the existing structure could be <br />used, or tax- subsidized housing is a possibility. He asked that with the purchase option, <br />the plan of presentation before the Planning Commission and Council in August be upheld. <br />Schroeder asked what studies were done to see if such a project was viable. O'Sullivan <br />said he stood on the corner and viewed the situation. He noted that since the proposal, <br />others have approached him with interest in the project. Coen added that a cash flow <br />review showed favorable results. <br />Lindquist asked if O'Sullivan would require a certain amount of the building to have lease <br />commitments prior to building. O'Sullivan said he would look at 70 -80 %. Berg said <br />leases would have to be the length of the mortgage. It was noted that of the 23,000 s.f. <br />size, 19,000 would be for office and retail use. <br />O'Sullivan said he has spoken with the Engineer, Shawn Gustafson, who said the plan <br />appears to be a good use and feasible from an engineering standpoint. The engineering <br />• issues will be addressed. <br />• <br />In obtaining Commission viewpoints, Stoddard saw the plan as a good buffer to the <br />residential area. Lindquist said he was in favor of the project. Peterson saw the project <br />and rezoning as appropriate and as a catalyst for the Navarre area. Smith said she was <br />okay with the plan. She did not see it as the perfect buffer; though acknowledged, there <br />may not be a perfect solution. <br />Smith asked why B -5 was considered. Gaffron reviewed the uses in the business districts <br />noting the fit of the B -5 uses with the area. B -I had the most uses. B -3 requires a 2 -acre <br />minimum lot size and accommodates shopping centers and multiple buildings. B -4 <br />provided for professional and office but without any retail. B -5 allows for such uses as <br />municipal, office, clinics, art stores, office supply, real estate, barber shops, photo stores, <br />hobby and gift, antiques, libraries, pet store, and other miscellaneous retail. Other B -5 <br />areas in the City are to the west end of Navarre, with a furniture store, a non - conforming <br />gas station, a Dairy Queen, a veterinarian office, an auto parts store, and office space. <br />Schroeder said he liked the look of the project and asked for direction on how rezoning <br />process occurs. Gaffi on reviewed the process. Schroeder asked that traffic flow <br />improvements be considered and other businesses be encouraged to work with the City for <br />revitalizing the area. <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.