My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-15-1996 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
07-15-1996 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2019 2:06:49 PM
Creation date
7/10/2019 2:06:48 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON JULY 15, 1996 <br />( 99 - 92154 John O'Sullivan/Erwin Smith - Continued) <br />Gaffron said the issue is whether the property should be rezoned from residential to <br />commercial. There is B -1 zoning on two sides of the property. The northern side is an <br />existing 1/2 acre residential neighborhood. On the east side is an outlot containing a <br />wetland area which is a density credit for the Lafayette Ridge neighborhood. The site <br />itself consists of 4 tax parcels, portions of which are within the 1000' lakeshore setback. <br />Hardcover regulations allow for 35% coverage over these portions of the property. <br />Gaffron reported that the Comprehensive Plan calls for the City to encourage private <br />development in the Navarre area but to not adversely affect the neighboring property. <br />Woodland areas are to be maintained also. The plan calls for neighboring retail and <br />professional services to be available. <br />Gaffron reported that there is pressure on Orono and other cities to provide affordable <br />housing and questioned whether this property might meet such a need. In reviewing the <br />property, Gaffron said it could hold three 1/2 acre single family residences. With its <br />proximity to the neighboring businesses, other options could be three 2 -unit duplexes or <br />M -6 density housing. Gaffron asked that the Commission make their considerations in the <br />scheme of enhancing the Navarre area and in consideration of the area as a whole. A <br />study was begun in 1987 to review the Navarre area. Business owners were not interested <br />• in pursuing any changes at that time. <br />Peterson brought attention to the public information hearings conducted by O'Sullivan on <br />the project. Peterson attended one of the meetings and noted favorable input from those <br />in attendance. Peterson noted only one variance appeared to be required for this proposal. <br />However, the issue of rezoning is serious and has rarely been changed in the history of the <br />City. Peterson continued that if such rezoning was done, this is is a logical location but <br />use is a different matter altogether_ The comments Peterson heard at the meetings favored <br />the rezoning. The neighbors were said to view the proposal as a viable option. <br />is <br />Stoddard said he attended both meetings and saw overwhelming support for the proposal. <br />He noted that something needs to happen with the vacated church property adding that <br />the B -5 zoning was a less stringent application. As to the housing possibility, Stoddard <br />said he understands the need but noted having a proposal at hand from a local <br />businessman. Stoddard did acknowledge the need for review of a Navarre beautification <br />plan or revitalization. Peterson responded that the business owners showed no interest <br />when presented with such an idea. He added that the City would not proceed without that <br />interest from the local businesses. <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.