My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-20-1996 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
05-20-1996 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2019 2:05:42 PM
Creation date
7/10/2019 2:05:41 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON MAY 20, 1996 <br />• <br />( #2 - #2112 Richard Putnam - Continued) <br />Putnam added that the deck was falling down, and he could not wait for variance approval <br />to receive the permit before reconstructing the deck. <br />There were no public comments. <br />Smith commented that if the deck had not already been replaced, the Planning <br />Commission would look for additional areas for reduction of hardcover Gaffron said it <br />might be argued that the deck replacement is a continuation of work that was authorized <br />in 1987. He noted the pavers and rock walls were appropriate, and the width of the <br />driveway was necessary. Smith asked if the replacement was part of the past resolution. <br />Gaffron said it was not, but it could be argued that it possibly was based on the wording. <br />Hawn moved, Lindquist seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2112 per the <br />StatTs recommendation. Vote- Ayes 5, Nays 0_ <br />Putnam asked to comment on the Casco Point area bringing the Commissioners attention <br />to the plat map in Exhibit B. He noted that although the area was zoned for 1/2 acre lots, <br />100' minimum width, and related setbacks, only 5 or 6 of the lots on the plat meet the 100' <br />width. Putnam said most of the lots do not meet the existing zoning codes, and he sees no <br />• merit to the codes as they exist. He does not understand the need for applicants to request <br />variances when the ordinances do not work for the properties on Casco Point. Putnam <br />noted that the homes in the area are not tear downs. He said Casco Point was a diverse <br />area, unique, and he is irritated by the social engineering caused by the bureaucracy, and <br />the waste of time and money spent in gaining approval for such projects as his deck <br />replacement. Putnam said others were not coming in to the City for review of projects but <br />doing work without permits, adding that the process was not working. <br />Smith commented about requesting reductions in hardcover and justification of existing <br />L <br />ardcover. <br />Putnam said the taxes were outrageous for the area and felt people were treated poorly. <br />He saw the issue as being a double standard between lakeshore and non - lakeshore <br />properties. Putnam asked that the Staff be allowed more flexibility in situations such as <br />what exists on Casco Point. <br />Peterson said he understood the frustration. He noted the problem with property owners <br />building more than what is allowed for the lot sizes. <br />Putnam asked that the City tell the County to put a "throttle" on taxes. He acknowledged <br />the job well -done by Staff in his dealings with the City in his remodeling, and asked the <br />• Commission to address these issues as soon as possible. <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.