My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-15-1996 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
04-15-1996 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2019 2:04:57 PM
Creation date
7/10/2019 2:04:56 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON APRIL 15, 1996 <br />9 ( #9 - #2128 Orono Hockey Boosters - Continued) <br />is <br />Peterson asked about the walkway between the arena and school. The path will be <br />setback from Old Crystal Bay Road, 40' in length, and of bituminous materials. The lease <br />calls for the path to be maintained by the school and replacement costs paid for by the <br />Boosters. Karin 7.eeb said the students will use the hill inside of the path taking the <br />shortest route possible. <br />The fencing placement and material, separating the arena from the residential area, will be <br />determined once the building is erected with direction provided from Gerry Timm as to <br />the type. <br />Jim Grabek, 3050 Jamestown Road, said the project has been underway for years, yet the <br />neighbors have only been involved since January. He said the setback was changed to <br />accommodate the project. He feels the lot is inadequate for the number of parking spaces <br />and will create parking problems during major events. Grabek said, with the shortcoming <br />of the school budget, he objects to spending $175,000. He said the building placement is <br />inconsistent with the comprehensive plan. He noted the plan calls for the promotion of <br />development with that of a neighborhood and not in conflict with a neighborhood. He <br />said he is not opposed to the arena but feels the site is not appropriate to the <br />neighborhood or for the City. Grabek said the arena is inconsistent with the open space <br />plan. <br />Grabek reviewed pictures taken of the site with the Commission in relation to CoRd 6. <br />He asked that the Commission consider moving the building to provide more protection <br />for the neighbors. Grabek said the soil borings are not conclusive that the building could <br />not be moved to the south. <br />Engebretson said he had informed Grabek that if money was the issue, the Boosters would <br />move the arena to the south. He said they reviewed it from an aesthetic and functionality <br />standpoint. <br />Roseboom noted that the building has a corporate look, not that of a building with many <br />loading doors. Roseboom said the preference is not to place a parking lot in front of the <br />door. He noted the receipt of sunlight is the functional factor with a south facing building <br />being the best. Grabek asked about an entrance to the east or the southeast side. <br />Roseboom said arenas work best with entrances on the ends of the building. Grabek <br />suggested entering across the wetland and asked for additional soil borings. Engebretson <br />said there is no reason for additional soil borings as it is not an issue of soils or cost but <br />one of aesthetics and functionality. <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.