01-16-1996 Planning Commission Minutes

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 16, 1996 • (#5 - Proposed Zoning Amendment - Continued) The question of sewering arose. It was reported that a sewer connection would be needed for practicality, which would require an amendment to the Orono Comprehensive Plan. An amendment is being proposed, including the school property as well as other areas. A question as to the funding was asked. The audience was informed that 2 -1/2 million dollars would be needed to build the arena and would come from donations. A person asked if the road improvements could be paid for by the public. Schroeder informed the person that the Orono Boosters would be responsible for any road improvements necessary. A question arose as to the suitability of the arena for the property in regards to setbacks. Schroeder said the setbacks are not being discussed at this time, but there would be specific standard performances to be met. Gaff-on added that ultimately, there would be the need to discuss the standards, and the Commission needs to define when that discussion will occur, especially in view of the interest by the public. Schroeder moved to table the amendment discussion to a work session. • A neighbor of the property under discussion commented that the issue goes way beyond the idea of green grass but also to lights and noise associated with such a project. Engebretson, president of the Orono Boosters, commented that the plan was in a sketch plan review at this point, but he welcomed knowing now if there were any major implications to hinder the project. Engebretson noted the neighborhood meeting was scheduled to enable the Boosters to determine if the project was realistic. The outcome of the neighborhood meeting would then be relayed to the City. Schroeder asked if there was any concern with the greenhouse portion of the amendment. Gaffron read the section of the ordinance regarding greenhouses, informed the Commissioners of the greenhouse operations in the City and their historic "good neighbor" characteristic, and noted Staffs concern regarding the lack of large buildings being accountable in the table set forth to determine sizes of accessory structures in relation to the size of lots. The table is being considered for amendment on tonight's agenda. Gaffron said this item may need to be discussed regarding reasonable performance standards for such uses. Steve Kelley of Kelley Nursery said he was in attendance because of his concern over changes to the amendment regarding greenhouses. Gaffron noted Kelley's "good neighbor" status and the lack of complaints regarding his business. The audience was asked to leave their names and addresses if they were interested in being notified of an upcoming work session on the amendment. 8