Laserfiche WebLink
0 <br />• <br />1�1 <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 20, 1.995 <br />(#I - #2082 Richard Stark - Continued) <br />Mabusth asked the Commissioners if the trees were replaced in the 0 -75' zone and not in <br />the areas described as "A" or "B ". Lindquist was told 10 trees would be planted in 0 -75' <br />setback area. Lindquist saw no problem with area "B" but felt area "A" should have <br />replacement of tree for tree. Peterson said that would be consistent with other <br />applications. <br />Stark questioned tree replacement under the agreement for the easement. Mabusth said <br />there was no direction in the code and has been based on the judgment of Staff. Tree <br />removal in 0 -75' requires permits issued by Staff. Mabusth told Stark if he objected to <br />Planning Commission recommendations to present his position before the Council. As far <br />as the easement, Mabusth said the agreement stipulates that no trees can be removed <br />without City approval. <br />There were no public comments. <br />Smith said she agreed with Lindquist in his request for tree replacement. Lindquist said he <br />felt particularly strong about tree replacement in area "A ". Stark said he strongly objected <br />to placing trees in this area. Stark said there are alot of trees on the property. It is not his <br />intent to gain a view of the lake. At the time, the property was not open to use of the <br />lake. Stark noted that the house, itself, was not in view. <br />Mabusth asked Stark how many trees were already dead that were removed. Of the 10 <br />trees removed, Stark said probably half of them were dead. Hawn commented that a <br />buckthorn was removed, and she was glad to see that particular tree removed. Stark said <br />an oak tree was choking it out. <br />Peterson received confirmation that the reroofing project completed without a permit was <br />satisfied. <br />Lindquist asked Stark if he would agree to the replacement of 5 trees in area "A ". Stark <br />said he would if they could be planted to the side. Mabusth commented that tree <br />placement was not an issue as long as plantings were achieved in specified areas. <br />Lindquist moved, Smith seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2082 with 5 <br />trees being replaced in area "A" of similar size, 1.0 trees replaced in the 0 -75' zone, and <br />granting of a new easement. The tree replacement is to be completed by July 15, 1996. <br />Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />