Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 16, 1995 <br />( #2 - #2078 Jensen Homes - Continued) <br />Mabusth commented that Staff would want the easement defined on the plat. It was again <br />noted it was unclear how much area was designated on the abstract. Gronberg suggested <br />looking at the traveled road. Lindquist said designation of the number of feet for the <br />easement would be required. <br />Knight suggested the application be tabled until all parties involved in the two applications <br />can meet and discuss a solution satisfactory to all parties. <br />Schroeder suggested tabling the application until the facts of the later application were <br />made known. <br />Jensen asked if the original deed does not specify an easement width, if it could be <br />approved subject to the survey by Gronberg of the roadway. It was noted that the <br />easement and roadway need to be designated as the numbers may differ. There was also <br />concern if the septic site was in the easement. Jensen noted the easement would only <br />benefit Knight and not the general public. He also asked if the approval could be based on <br />what the deed shows as the easement. Peterson said without knowing the size of the <br />easement, the Planning Commission would need to table the application. Lindquist said <br />the Commission also needed to gain information on the other properties in question. <br />i <br />Schroeder moved, Lindquist seconded, to table Application #2078 subject to determining <br />the size of the easement and the knowledge of the other affected application. <br />Knight commented that he would also like to hear the facts of the other application and <br />suggested that application be tabled also. Mabusth replied that Application #2077 is a <br />sketch plan review only and no motion would be needed. <br />Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />( 0) #2031 BRUCE R KELLY, 2340 FOX STREET - PRELIMINARY <br />SUBDIVISION - CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING 7:04 -7:09 P.M. <br />The Applicants were present. <br />Mabusth reported that the application is for a division of two lots of a 6 acre homestead <br />parcel. The preliminary survey has been completed. Principal and alternate septic sites <br />have also been determined for each lot. The future owner of the 4 acre lot will need to <br />understand the impact of an easement on lot area. The existing driveway location can be <br />shared by the east lot. No variances would be required. <br />0 There were no public comments. <br />4 <br />