Laserfiche WebLink
�J <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 16, 1995 <br />( #10 - #2074 John and Kristen Gehring - Continued) <br />Hawn moved, Schroeder seconded, to recommend approval of the retaining wall with <br />Staff recommendations. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />As for the garage, Lindquist asked if the Commission was able to approve a garage <br />without understanding where the pond would be located. Peterson said he had the same <br />concern. Mabusth said this was a recent issue. Staff is unable to issue a permit without <br />seeing an approved grading plan by the Corp of Engineers and the MCWD. <br />The applicant said he was told by the MCWD that preliminary approval would be required <br />from the City before the MCWD would look at the issue. Gehring asked if the City would <br />approve the application for the garage with the condition that the required permits were <br />received from the Corp of Engineers and the MCWD. Mabusth said she was not <br />comfortable with bringing the application before the Council with questions unanswered. <br />The applicant said it was his plan to build the garage this fall. Schroeder commented that <br />the City Engineer would need to approve the drainage plans. Peterson said the Council <br />would not approve the garage without the permits in hand from the Corp of Engineers and <br />the MCWD. The applicant noted that the meeting of the MCWD was scheduled for <br />October 9, and the Council meeting was scheduled for October 13. <br />Mabusth questioned whether Palm would need to be jointly involved with the creation of <br />the pond. Palm said it was his understanding that his part would be only where the pipe is <br />located. Mabusth said the retaining pond would possibly be located on the Palm property <br />too. Palm said he was unsure of this and thought the pipe would carry the drainage to the <br />swale on his property. Peterson noted that the solution may be a swale, but it was <br />possible that a swale may not be enough, and a pond would be required. Lindquist was of <br />the opinion that the pond should be a joint proposal by both Gehring and Palm. Mabusth <br />noted that Staff will be working with both parties on storm water management. <br />Lindquist asked if conceptual approval could be granted. Mabusth said matching retention <br />areas on the property would be required to compensate for the flood plain. <br />Schroeder said if Staff could continue to work with the application, was the Commission <br />and Staff comfortable with turning the proposal over to the City Engineer in this form. <br />Peterson voiced some concern with the size of the structure. Mabusth clarified that it was <br />not an oversized structure and did meet the required setbacks. The excess hardcover is in <br />the 0 -75' zone and not in the 75 -250' zone. <br />Lindquist moved, Hawn seconded, to approve the construction of the 3 -car garage with <br />the understanding that the application not proceed to Council until it has been approved by <br />• the City's Public Works Director and City Engineer, the MCWD, and the Corp of <br />Engineers. <br />16 <br />