Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 18, 1995 <br />( #8 - #2062 Ted Rozeboom/Josephine Knudson - Continued) <br />Schroeder asked the applicant if he would be able to work out of his own home. <br />Rozeboom said he would lose the integrity of the Victorian style home and needed the <br />space provided by the other residence. <br />Several ideas were aired regarding a lot combination and a "skyway" or structure of some <br />sort to connect the homes or ownership change of the residences. <br />Gaffron commented that one option to consider absent legal combination but with <br />common ownership was a "special lot combination" document that is filed on the chain of <br />title of both properties that would define what may be done on the properties. Hawn <br />inquired of the applicant again if he would be willing to combine the lots. Rozeboom said <br />he would lose too much market value but would be willing to put the other residence in <br />his name and homestead it. <br />Gaffron read a letter from Mr. Henney, , 2941 Casco Point Road, voicing his support of <br />the application. <br />Gaffron again noted the Attorney's opinion on the use variance as to whether it would <br />allow the use in that residence. Barrett opined that it would not be a use variance. <br />Rozeboom asked, and received confirmation, that if the "special lot combination" were to <br />be done, it could be terminated if the lot ownership would change. It was further <br />commented that if the relationship were to change or the residence sold, it could also be <br />terminated but it cannot exist in the present configuration. <br />Rowlette moved, Smith seconded, to approve Application #2062 with a special lot <br />combination defining the relationship of the parties involved, with both parcels being <br />placed in Rozeboom's name but not required to be legally combined. The use would be <br />allowed until Rozeboom was no longer the owner of both properties. He would be <br />required to meet the home occupation conditions except the three noted. No signs or <br />rental of the property could occur. A portion of the blacktop would be removed and a <br />landscaping plan be presented prior to going forward to the Council. <br />Schroeder asked for clarification of what is a special lot combination document. Gaffron <br />cited an example of separate but commonly -owned properties located on two sides of a <br />road. The owner wants a house on one side but the garage on the other side. This might <br />be allowed under a "special lot combination" as the lots were sold together. Schroeder <br />asked if the application was a typical example. Gaffron said it was an unusual example of <br />the use but with the City's discretion, it could be done. The document would be on the <br />chain of title, and if broken, it would revert back to its original intent. <br />• <br />19 <br />