Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 21, 1995 <br />0 <br />( #14 - #2056 Michael & Barbara Wigley - Continued) <br />Hawn said if the boulder walls were wanted to hold soil before revegetation, a landscaper <br />should be able to provide plants that germinate quickly. Silt fencing was noted to be an <br />option to prevent erosion into the lake while vegetation was germinating. <br />Peterson moved, Schroeder seconded, to table Application #2056 for redesigning and <br />gaining of a MCWD permit. Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br />Lindquist said the walls would more than likely be denied by the lake and is not in favor of <br />going ahead with this proposal. <br />Schroeder said if erosion was clearly shown, then he would be willing to look at the <br />proposal. <br />Smith said she did not see the project to include boulder walls. <br />The applicant responded that her major concern for the project was the safety of her <br />children. <br />( #15) #2057 JAMES NYSTROM, 1745 CONCORDIA STREET - VARIANCES - <br />PUBLIC HEARING 10:58 -11:22 P.M. <br />The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. <br />Mr. Nystrom and his architect, Greg Frazee, were present. <br />Gaffron reported that the application has been amended and is now proposed as a <br />residential tear down and replacement. The principal structure is presently located within . <br />the 0 -75' zone and is proposed at the 75' line with a 10' wide deck encroaching the 0 -75' <br />zone. The detached garage will also be taken down and reconstructed to meet the setback <br />requirements. Hardcover in the 0 -75' zone would be significantly reduced with increases <br />shown in the 75 -250' and significantly so in the 250 -500' zone. The side setback is <br />proposed at 9.5' where 10' is required. The average lakeshore setback is also an issue to <br />the house on the north. <br />Lindquist asked if the deck and house could be moved back 10', resulting in no hardcover <br />in the 0 -75' zone. Frazee said this could be done but preferred the proposed scenario. <br />The house to the south extends into the 75' setback with a porch touching the side lot line. <br />With the proposed house located at the 75' line, it allows the applicant to maintain the <br />same view as the neighbor and the ability to look beyond the house. If the house is moved <br />back 10', the view of the lake would be limited. <br />Lindquist said he had a problem with an structure in the 0 -75'. <br />q p Y <br />21 <br />