My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-21-1995 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
08-21-1995 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2019 1:52:20 PM
Creation date
7/10/2019 1:52:18 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 21, 1995 <br />( #8 - #2046 Lakeview Golf - Continued) <br />Gaffron reported that the application was to construct a storage building and to rebuild the <br />15th and 16th fairways on the SE corner of the golf course. It was noted that the 1974 <br />survey did not include an existing storage building or applicant's house, which is a separate <br />homestead property. It also does not show the RLS correctly. Gaffron asked for an <br />updated survey to be completed as part of the approval. <br />The storage building is proposed at 45x100' in size to be located in the northwest <br />quadrant, 640' from North Arm Road, and visible from both North Arm Drive West and <br />CoRd 19. The building would exceed the 3,000 s.f of building limit at 4,500 s.f. The <br />code allows for an accessory structure on a 9 acre parcel of 3000 s.f. with 6000 s.f <br />maximum for total of all accessory structure footprint areas. Gaffron noted that an <br />amendment has been drafted to allow 200 s.f of accessory structure for each additional <br />acre. 17 acres would be required to support the accessory structure under that <br />amendment. <br />A concern with the proposal is the open view of the accessory structure. It is anticipated <br />that none of the existing mature trees would be removed to accomodate this building. The <br />building will be an average of 16.5' in height of a pole barn type. Screening is <br />• recommended along with color of materials to be chosen to blend into the scenery. <br />The relocation of fairways #15 and #16 will require movement of 1800 cubic yards of fill <br />within the site. As part of a sketch plan, a 2 acre lot subdivision is also proposed. The <br />applicant said the proposal would require carving out of a hill in order to create a view of <br />the green on the second shot. Gaffron said the City Engineer had no problem with the <br />grading. If it is approved, Staff asks that the applicant adher to Best Management <br />Practices in regards to erosion and runoff control. Revegetation would occur as soon as <br />possible in order to play the holes the next year. <br />Peterson asked what color was proposed for the storage building. The applicant said a <br />green or earth tone would be attractice. <br />Smith asked why such a large structure was required. The applicant said the amount of <br />equipment, such as mowers, back hoe, loaders, mulchers, has increased over the years and <br />need to be stored. The majority of the equipment is now outside. It was noted there <br />would be no access to this structure. Smith asked if the smaller storage building could be <br />removed. She was informed that the other building houses the golf carts. Smith also <br />inquired about screening, which is also proposed. <br />Peterson said a CUP to move the fill around should not create any problems as it is not on <br />the roadway and also saw no problem with the size of the structure. Peterson suggested <br />the applicant work with Staff on screening. <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.