Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON JUNE 19, 1995 <br />( #2 - 92029 William Smith - Continued) <br />Lindquist was informed that Lot 1 cannot be further subdivided due to the wetlands. <br />Lindquist said this would mean that there would be a maximum of three lots served by the <br />driveway if approved. <br />The Applicant asked the Commission to consider the similarities with the Stronghold <br />subdivision. where a 30' outlot roadwav was aonroved. which abuts the McMillan <br />property. This roadway would also extend no further. The majority of the driveway <br />serves two existing residences; the new drive would turn off immediately. Mabusth said <br />this is a narrow gravel easement drive. The Stronghold property is served by a paved <br />platted outlot. There is a 14' designated easement, but the actual driveway is 10' in its <br />present state. <br />Mabusth said there is a need to retain the 26' setback from the wetlands. It was noted <br />that there is a loop or turnaround adjacent to the home that could meet the needs of the <br />fire department if necessary. Smith said if the application is approved, the barn will be <br />relocated. A larger turnaround could be created where a large vehicle could drive in. <br />back up and drive out. Smith plans on creating additional parking for the approach to the <br />house. <br />isPeterson said the City is looking at the driveway issue in general. The fire and police <br />departments would like larger turnarounds. No changes have been made to the ordinance <br />as yet. Peterson recommended maintaining the drive without paving. <br />Smith said if an immediate cut were made, it would affect large trees and is also where the <br />septic enters the property. So as to not disturb the topography of the site, Smith asked for <br />a cut from the driveway further to the north. <br />Lindquist would like to see the driveway easement be wider than 14'. Mabusth said this <br />may create a problem in getting 2 acres dry contiguous. Smith said the original cut was <br />14' and vegetation has encroached into the 14'. Mabusth asked Lindquist if he felt the <br />outlot or easement should extend all the way to Lot 3. It was noted that the middle lot is <br />owned by another person, and the City has no authority to include advising this property <br />as to the need to now create a driveway outlot. Smith asked that the first portion, 50'- <br />75',of the drive extending to the first turn off be wider and base the width on the space <br />available rather than the 15' outlot. <br />It was noted that changes to the middle lot could trigger pulling the scenario all together. <br />This lot is not large enough for subdivision. Mabusth ouestioned why the applicant would <br />join in the subdivision? Smith said the owner of the lots informed him the turnaround was <br />available for emergency vehicles. Smith said he is willing to do what is necessary to allow <br />rigs to enter the upper lot. <br />