Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
I began work on this proposed zoning before I ever knew <br />about the 1966 incident. <br />I want it on record that pumative damages will be sought <br />against each member of the Planning Commission and Council <br />-and anyone else involved in formulating the new zoning ord- <br />inance. <br />People of B -2 area have a let+er of protest to the City. It <br />is signed by all the people in the area. I invested money <br />in it for one purpose: Because it is zoned Lake Commercial. <br />I paid a considerable amount of money for the property. Under <br />the present proposed zoning, you will allow only 4 units to <br />be built on the property. <br />Three to four per acre. A total of 6 for the total piece. <br />I couldn't build and sell residential units sitting next to <br />two marinas. Property here will lay and deteriorate to <br />nothing. Where did you get the information on Maxwell Bay? <br />Chairman VanNest <br />Larry Hork <br />Stan Straley <br />Chairman VanNest <br />Stan Straley <br />-from the LMCD, substantial surveys from Hennepin .,.,. <br />I talked with Hennepin County and they said Maxwell Bay is Stan'Straley <br />one of three least used bays on the Lake. This is an effort <br />to get away from commercial zoning by devious means. Your <br />arguments are being shot full of holes. I will back Hork to <br />the full extent. <br />I am speaking for the Lake Minnetonka Improvement Association. <br />I <br />George Johnson <br />am in support of the total zoning change proposal. The <br />group supports the zoning proposal and opposes the restaur- <br />ant on Maxwell Bay. <br />Casco Point - As a mother and a resident, I looked at the <br />property involved. I would not consider living there, <br />Mrs. Charles Davis <br />and <br />it should remain commercial. <br />This area is not a nice neighborhood, and it is too late for <br />this type of <br />Don Stoffer <br />proposal. <br />The traffic on the/ Bay is high. The Planning ommission's <br />g <br />Herman Renner <br />proposal is great, <br />You are not solving the problem by rezoning it to residential. <br />because the Marina will <br />Dick Karl <br />still exist. Is it possible to allow <br />a restaurant and not rezone the land? <br />The fear is that the Marinas will expand into the area that is <br />presently occupied by the homes. <br />Brad VanNest <br />If the property is rezoned, the value will be less than the <br />original cost to Mr. Straley. If <br />Mr. Gratwall <br />we weigh.the public interest <br />against the cost-to Mr. Straley, it seems like the rezoning is <br />not justified. <br />The property along Navarre Lane is shown as residential prop- <br />erty. Why? I am in <br />Mr. Block <br />objection to this proposal. <br />