septic info - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Property address: 220 Wakefield Rd. Orono, MN 55391 Inspector initials/Date: JS 1 8/14/2015 (mm/dd*W) 4. Soil Separation—Compliance component#4 of 5 Date of installation: 9/10/1984 ❑ Unknown Verification method(s): (mm/dd/yyyy) ShorelandNVellhead protection/Food beverage Soil observation does not expire. Previous soil lodging? ❑Yes ❑ No observations by two independent parties are sufficient, unless site conditions have been altered or local Compliance criteria: requirements differ. For systems built prior to April 1, 1996, and ®Yes ❑ No ®Conducted soil observation(s)(Attach boring logs) not located in Shore/and or Wellhead ❑Two previous verifications(Attach boring logs) Protection Area or not serving a food, beverage or lodging establishment: ❑ Not applicable(Holding tank(s),no drainfield) Drainfield has at least a two-foot vertical ❑ Unable to verify(See Comments/Explanation) separation distance from periodically ❑ Other(See CommentsiExplanation) saturated soil or bedrock. Non-performance systems built April 1, ❑Yes (--] No Comments/Explanation: 1996, or later or for non performance systems located in Shore/and or Wellhead Boring: Protection Areas or serving a food, 1-24" 10YR 2/2 Sandy Clay Loam beverage, or lodging establishment: 24-66" 10YR 4/4 Sandy Clay Loam Drainfield has a three-foot vertical separation distance from periodically No Redox found. saturated soil or bedrock.* "Experimental", "Other, or Performance" ❑Yes ❑ No Indicate depths or elevations systems built under pre-2008 Rules,Type IV or V systems built under 2008 Rules(7080. A. Bottom of distribution media 30" 2350 or 7080.2400 (Advanced Inspector License required) B. Periodically saturated soil/bedrock 721.+ Drainfield meets the designed vertical C. System separation 3611+ separation distance from periodically saturated soil or bedrock. D. Required com liance se aration* 24" Any "no"answer above indicates the system is *May be reduced up to 15 percent if allowed by Local failing to protect groundwater. Ordinance. 5. OperatingPermit and Nitrogen BMP*—Compliance component#5 of 5 $ p p Not applicable Is the system operated under an Operating Permit? ❑Yes ❑ No If"yes",A below is required Is the system required to employ a Nitrogen BMP? ❑Yes ❑ No If"yes", B below is required BMP=Best Management Practice(s)specked in the system design K the answer to bothuestions is "no" this section does snot need to be completed. Compliance criteria a. Operating Permit number: Have the Operating Permit requirements been met? Yes [] No b. Is the required nitrogen BMP in place and properly functioning? ❑Yes El No Any "no"answer indicates Noncompliance. Upgrade Requirements(Minn. Stat.§115.55)An imminent threat to public health and safety(ITPHS)must be upgraded,replaced,or its use discontinued within ten months of receipt of this notice or within a shorter period if required by local ordinance.If the system is failing to protect ground water,the system must be upgraded,replaced,or its use discontinued within the time required by local ordinance.If an existing system is not failing as defined in law,and has at least two feet of design soil separation,then the system need not be upgraded,repaired,replaced,or its use discontinued,notwithstanding any local ordinance that is more strict. This provision does not apply to systems in shoreland areas, Wellhead Protection Areas,or those used in connection with food,beverage,and lodging establishments as defined in law. www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 800-657-3864 TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats wq-wwfsts4-31 • 3116112 Page 3 of 3