Laserfiche WebLink
CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 6 <br />These natural ponding areas serve an integral function within the natural ecological system of Lake <br />Minnetonka. The "Harza Study" includes quantitative data identifying how the wetland soils easily retain <br />phosphorus, and how marsh plants take up and incorporate large amounts of nitrogen and phosphorus into <br />their growing tissue. Thus, the marshlands are the primary pollution filters for Lake Minnetonka's surface <br />water runoff. <br /> <br />Since marshes and small lakes in the watershed aggregate nearly as much area as the main body of Lake <br />Minnetonka, their potential for supplying water to the subsurface formations is appreciable. In addition, <br />marshes provide diversity in the kinds of open space available within the region. They provide a habitat <br />which is uniquely suited for certain birds and mammals. They can be utilized to provide storage of storm <br />runoff with minimal disruption to their function as a habitat for wildlife and their ability to reduce the <br />phosphorus input to the lake. <br /> <br />Development Impacts on Wetlands. When urban development occurs, the function of the natural <br />drainageways and filtration system is adversely affected in three ways: The speed and quantity of the <br />storm water runoff are increased as the absorption ability of the land is eliminated with hardcover (houses, <br />driveways, roads, etc.). This increase in the speed and quantity of storm water runoff causes the third <br />adverse effect, which is the increase of the amount of nutrients which are contained in the storm water <br />runoff which now has less time in the natural marsh filtration system to be purified before entering the <br />lake. Nutrients contained in dying vegetation, lawn fertilizers, and from other urban sources are discharged <br />into the lake faster and in greater quantities as the level of urbanization increases. (Harza Study) <br /> <br />Orono does not rely solely on the ability of the natural filtration system of the marshes and drainageways <br />to purify storm water so necessary for the preservation of Lake Minnetonka. <br /> <br />Supplementary Stormwater Ponding & Alternatives. While Orono's Surface Water Management Plan <br />adopted in 2002 places a significant emphasis on preservation of wetlands, it also provides for the <br />establishment of supplementary stormwater management ponds to help counteract the impacts of <br />development within the watershed. <br /> <br />NURP (National Urban Runoff Program) pond design criteria are primarily based on the removal of <br />suspended particles such as sand, silt, etc. Secondary design criteria enhance the capability of NURP <br />ponds to remove other pollutants such as trace metals, hydrocarbons, nutrients (such as phosphorus) and <br />pesticides. Phosphorus is mainly removed through biological uptake in algae and aquatic plants. When <br />the algae die, the nutrients fall to the bottom of the pond and become part of the sediments. <br /> <br />Ponds in the Twin Cities area designed according to NURP standards have total phosphorus removal <br />efficiencies of 47 to 68 percent according to Walker. Possibilities for improving this include (1) increasing <br />mean pond depth; (2) promoting infiltration; (3) promoting plug flow conditions (i.e. multiple cell ponds); <br />(4) applying chemicals to precipitate out the ortho-phosphorus (alum treatments); (5) encouraging growth <br />of certain aquatic plants; and (6) design of outlet structure to provide extended detention of large runoff <br />events. Whether each of these enhancements can or should be incorporated is dependent on the desired <br />level of control and other site specific conditions. <br /> <br />Constructed wetlands have potential benefits as well as drawbacks. Additionally, the cost of constructing <br />stormwater ponds and storm sewer systems is enormous compared to the cost of wetland preservation.