Laserfiche WebLink
Property address: 125 Truffala Trail,Orono,MN Inspector initials/Date: J. 0. 11/09/17 <br /> 4. Soil Separation—Compliance component#4 of 5 <br /> Date of installation: 10/03/1997 ❑Unknown Verification method(s): <br /> ShorelLodging?andNVeUhead protection/Food Beverage ❑Yes ®No Soil observation does not expire. Previous soil <br /> 9 <br /> observations by two independent parties are sufficient, <br /> Compliance criteria: unless site conditions have been altered or local <br /> For systems built prior to April 1, 1996, and ❑Yes ❑No requirements differ. <br /> not located in Shoreland or Wellhead ® Conducted soil observation(s)(Attach boring logs) <br /> Protection Area or not serving a food, ❑ Two previous verifications(Attach boring logs) <br /> beverage or lodging establishment: <br /> i [:1 Not applicable(Holding tank(s),no drelnfield) <br /> Drainfield has at least a two-foot vertical ❑ Unable to verify(See CommentsiExplanation) <br /> separation distance from periodically <br /> saturated soil or bedrock. ❑ Other(See Comments/Explanation) <br /> Non-performance systems built April 1, ®Yes ❑No Commentsffxplanation: <br /> 1996,or later or for non-performance <br /> systems located in Shoreland or Wellhead <br /> Protection Areas or serving a food, <br /> beverage,or lodging establishment: <br /> Drainfield has a three-foot vertical <br /> separation distance from periodically <br /> saturated soil or bedrock.* <br /> "Experimental" "Other, or Performance" ❑Yes ❑ No Indicate depths of elevations <br /> systems built underpre-2008 Rules,Type IV <br /> or V systems built under 2008 Rules(7080. A. Bottom of distribution media 104.7 <br /> 2350 or 7080.2400 (Advanced Inspector <br /> License required) B. Periodically saturated soilibedrock 101.7 <br /> Drainfield meets the designed vertical C. System separation i 3.0 <br /> separation distance from periodically <br /> saturated soil or bedrock. <br /> D. Required compliance separation* 1 2.6 <br /> Any"no"answer above indicates the system is *May be reduced up to 15 percent if allowed by Local <br /> Failing to Protect Groundwater. Ordinance. <br /> 5. Operating Permit and Nitrogen BMP*-Compliance component#5 of 5 ® Not applicable <br /> Is the system operated under an Operating Permit? ❑Yes ❑No If"yes",A below is required <br /> Is the system required to employ a Nitrogen BMP? ❑Yes ❑No If"yes",B below is required <br /> BMP--Best Management Practice(s)specified in the system design <br /> ff the answer to both questions is "no". this section does not need to be completed. <br /> Compliance criteria <br /> a. Operating Permit number: <br /> Have the Operatina Permit requirements been met? ❑Yes []No <br /> b. Is the required nitrogen BMP in place and propqrly functioning? Yes No <br /> Any"no"answer indicates Noncompliance. <br /> Upgrade Requirements(Minn.Stat.§115.55)An imminent threat to public health and safety(ITPHS)must be upgraded,replaced,or its use <br /> discontinued within ten months of receipt of this notice or within a shorter period if required by local ordinance.If the system is failing to protect <br /> ground water,the system must be upgraded,replaced,or its use discontinued within the time required by local ordinance.If an existing system <br /> is not failing as defined in law,and has at least two feet of design soil separation,then the system need not be upgraded,repaired,replaced,or <br /> its use discontinued,notwithstanding any local ordinance that is more sbict This provision does not apply to systems in shoreland areas, <br /> Wellhead Protection Areas,or those used in connection with food,beverage,and lodging establishments as defined in law. <br /> www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in altemattve formats <br /> wq-ww1sts4-31 • 1124112 <br /> Page 3 of 3 <br />