My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Re: property questions/problems
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
T
>
Tonkawa Road
>
1355 Tonkawa Road- 08-117-23-42-0010
>
Correspondence
>
Re: property questions/problems
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 5:47:20 PM
Creation date
6/26/2019 1:07:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
1355
Street Name
Tonkawa
Street Type
Road
Address
1355 Tonkawa Rd
Document Type
Correspondence
PIN
0811723420010
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 <br /> From: Gerald Ray [mailto:jerray410)gmail.com] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 20114:17 PM <br /> To: Lyle Oman <br /> Subject: Property questions/problems <br /> Lyle, <br /> I have a concern about the Mike Fasching property. I believe the address is 11355 Tonkawa Rd. <br /> We see a "For Sale" sign and wonder what will happen to the open issues when they sell. <br /> As I understand it, the driveway landscaping is infringing on Nancy McGovern's property - 3420 North Shore <br /> Drive(the NW corner of the lot - used to be the Ambrose Kivus property). <br /> In addition, the fence exceeds Orono's rules by height on back and side and forward of the house corners. Their <br /> fence is also infringing on my driveway access and they even ripped up a portion of the driveway and Orono <br /> told him he was in the deeded access(you may recall). He promised he would repair it but never did. <br /> The "common driveway" agreement for years was that we split the cost of maintaining the drive including snow <br /> removal. We have never asked the Fasching's to contribute as they appeared to have abandoned their use/rights <br /> to the common driveway. <br /> They exceeded the hard pack rule after getting their move in permit by adding gutters and pavers in the drive. <br /> They may have additional hard pack items that we are not aware of at this time. <br /> We suspect they had the proper permits for the rip rap on the shoreline but question if he did for the retaining <br /> wall within 75 feet of the lake. <br /> They have planted a barrier of trees and hedge from the fence to the lake shore edge right on or up to the <br /> property line. With that, they have installed a metal stake that is about 12" high with a wooden stake attached to <br /> it. At one time he also had a metal fence post about 5 feet high that I removed. They have removed a few of the <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.