My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 5681
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7499
>
Reso 5600 - 5699 (April 25, 2007 - December 3, 2007)
>
Resolution 5681
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2019 9:39:06 AM
Creation date
6/26/2019 9:39:04 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
0 <br /> 0 0 <br /> CITY of ORONO <br /> �� G~ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> SII04� NO. 5 68 1 <br /> 3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing <br /> held on September 17, 2007 and recommended approval of hardcover <br /> variances based on the following findings: <br /> a. The Property is 1.07 acres in size when 1.0 acres is required. <br /> b. The Property has a lot width of 427± feet at Tonkawa Road and has <br /> over 300 lineal feet along the shoreline. <br /> c. Due to the configuration of the lot, the wetland buffer and buffer <br /> setback, and the shoreline of the Property, the home must be <br /> constructed in the far north portion of the lot to meet setbacks. <br /> d. The Applicants' proposal meets the 30' height limitation. <br /> e. Because of sight visibility problems on Tonkawa Road, and in order to <br /> maintain the private, wooded nature of the lot, a "switch back" <br /> driveway has been proposed and will be necessary to safely exit the <br /> drive. <br /> f. The Applicants have proposed to utilize downspouts, gutters and rain <br /> gardens to manage their storm water on the site. <br /> 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings <br /> and recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, <br /> continents by the Applicants and the public, and the effect of the proposed <br /> variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. <br /> 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this Property are <br /> peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other Property in this zoning <br /> district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic <br /> conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring <br /> Property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the Applicants, but <br /> is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary <br /> to preserve a substantial Property right of the Applicants; and would be in <br /> keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive <br /> Plan of the City. <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.