Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #2049 <br /> August 14, 1995 <br /> Page 2 <br /> The existing house is 42' from the shoreline. The existing deck is 34' from the <br /> shoreline. The proposal would increase the bulk of physical structure encroachment in the 0-75' <br /> zone. In order to construct the screen porch, applicants will be excavating under the existing <br /> deck, which may result in the need to replace footings under the east end of the house. The <br /> proposed screen porch would require perimeter footings. <br /> Additionally, applicants propose to replace existing lower level windows at the southeast <br /> front of the house with a glass door, requiring excavation to create the ability for a walkout. <br /> While this excavation is minimal in the number of cubic yards to be removed, it does expose <br /> a larger portion of the facade to the lake within 50' of the shoreline. <br /> Although applicants have suggested that this excavation plus a boulder wall adjacent to <br /> the main entry are to prevent erosion, there is no existing erosion problem, and the grading is <br /> merely to create the ability for a walkout door on the south facade. <br /> Applicant additionally proposes a series of low boulder retaining walls between the house <br /> and shoreline. There are a number of mature trees and some underbrush within 15' of the <br /> shoreline, but the slope is not so great that any significant erosion is occurring. The slope is <br /> certainly maintainable as it exists without boulder walls, and any excavation or filling to <br /> establish the proposed walls might have a negative impact on the existing trees and vegetation. <br /> Hardcover Issues <br /> There is some accessory hardcover in the 0-75' zone, including a 10' x 14' deck adjacent <br /> to the lake, sidewalks adjacent to the house, and a gravel driveway loop which appears recently <br /> upgraded. Applicants' survey indicates an 8' gravel driveway that previously led to the lake has <br /> been removed, as have a 10' x 11' shed and an 8' x 10' shed. (See survey, Exhibit D.) <br /> A faint sketch on the 1970 survey apparently used for the original building permit, as <br /> well as 1989 City air photos, suggest that a loop driveway and access drive to the lake has <br /> existed for many years. The portion leading to the lake (noted by surveyor as 800 s.f.) has <br /> recently been removed, but is not revegetated. The loop driveway has new gravel and sod <br /> boundaries and is clearly defined. Most of the loop is within the 0-75' setback zone. A <br /> hardcover analysis of the property is as follows: <br /> I. 0-75' Zone (Area = 33,050 s.f.) <br /> Structural Hardcover: <br /> House 770 s.f. <br /> Existing Deck (attached) 216 s.f. .! <br /> Deck (at lake) 120 s.f. ? <br /> 1,106 s.f. (3.35%) <br /> House 770 s.f. <br /> Proposed Att. Deck/Scr. Pch. 270 s.f. <br /> Deck (at lake) 120 s.f. <br /> 1,160 s.f. (3.51%) ;r/ <br />