Laserfiche WebLink
iYUNUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br /> ti ETING HELD ON OCTOBER 9, 199:5 <br /> . iE <br /> PLAiNT?4-L IG COiYLNIISSION CO:VnIMENTS <br /> There was no Planning Commission report- <br /> PUBLIC CO' LNM'N-TS <br /> There were no public comments_ <br /> N TG ADNIrgISTR-kTOR'S REPORT <br /> ZO. I <br /> (* 3) X2044 GEORGE OLSON, 2775 SEL DYWOOD ROAD - VAR--VNCE <br /> RESOLUTION T3610 <br /> Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to adopt Reso <br /> lution,-',' granting a hardcover <br /> variance to George Olson of=775 Shadywood Road for the construction of an addition <br /> to the existing residence. Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> (#4)-,,2049 CHIC DWIGHT/FRED GUTT <br /> OR,NZSON, 1220 TONKAWA ROAD - <br /> VARIANCE <br /> - RESOLUTION r-43611 <br /> The applicants were present. <br /> I <br /> Gaffon reported that the application is for a request for hardcover and lakeshore setback <br /> variances for a number of projects. The applicants would like to replace the existing deck <br /> on the lakeshore side of the residences ce for a walkout door, and construct low boelow the deck area, ulder <br /> excavate to the south side of the resrd <br /> walls, all of which is in the 0-75'zone. The current setback to the lake is 42' from the <br /> residence and 34' from the deck_ <br /> During Planning Commission review of August 21, 1995, the applicant received a Partial <br /> recommendation for approval of a screened porch under the deck and deck replacement <br /> and stairs. The approval was based on the deck not extending past the south wall of the <br /> residence. Excavation to the south side wall and retaining walls to allow a window to <br /> ed. The Planning Commission did not recommend <br /> become a doorway was recommend M <br /> the installation of the low boulder walls between the deck and shoreline as there was no <br /> justification or hardship shown. The approval was based on the condition that <br /> southeast <br /> J <br /> the small <br /> patio below the deck be removed,ravel driveway well as the small <br /> recommended to be top dressed <br /> section of the property- Theo .. <br /> and reveg ve the deck b the <br /> etated with full grass. The applicant was also asked to rerno Y <br /> lake. Gaffs on also noted that the DNR recommended denial <br /> enia of the deck and screened <br /> porch based on the fact that the properry is non-cora <br /> II <br /> 4 <br />