Laserfiche WebLink
.. - .. � <br /> � O� <br /> __ O .. O CITY of ORONO <br /> • � =���� RESOLUTION OF TI� CITY COUNCIL <br /> � �� � <br /> �, � �, NO. e� c� F_�`-. � <br /> s �, ti <br /> ��9� og�G <br /> E3I; <br /> A RESOLUTION GRANTING <br /> VARIANCES TO <br /> MUNICII'AL ZONING CODE <br /> SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 (B) AND 2; <br /> AND SECTION 10.24, SUBDIVISION 5 (B) <br /> FILE #1853 <br /> WHEREAS, Richard E. and A. Jean Engebretson (hereinafter "the applicants") <br /> have an interest in the property located at 1180 Tonkawa Road within the City of Orono <br /> (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: <br /> That part of Lot 9, Auditor's Subdivision No. 217, described as follows: Commencing <br /> at a point on the East right of way line of Hennepin County Road No. 135 distant <br /> 1141.25 feet Southeasterly, measured along said right of way line, from the intersection <br /> • of the North line of Lot 10, Auditor's Subdivision No. 217, and said right of way line; <br /> thence Northeasterly a distance of 143.2 feet to a point which is distant 1004.29 feet <br /> perpendicularly distance from the North line of said Lot 10, said Auditor's Subdivision <br /> and continuing on said line a distance of 36.2 feet, more or less to the shoreline of <br /> Maxwell Bay; thence Northwesterly along the shoreline of Maxwell Bay to a point which <br /> is distant 125 feet perpendicularly distance from the above described line; thence <br /> Southwesterly parallel to the above described line a distance of 205.3 feet more or less <br /> to the East right of way line of County Road No. 135; thence Southeasterly along said <br /> right of way line a distance of 125.04 feet to the point of beginning, Hennepin County, <br /> Minnesota (hereinafter. "the property"); and <br /> WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for variances to Municipal <br /> Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) to permit construction of a new residence to be <br /> located 56' from the shoreline where a 75' setback is required and where the existing structure <br /> is located 50 7 , and an average lakeshore setback variance for the residence structure that will <br /> encroach 6' where no such encroachment is allowed and where the existing structure is 21'. Per <br /> Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 hardcover within the 0-75' setback is proposed at 9.6% where <br /> 15.8% exists and where none is allowed and in the 75-250' setback 4,086.5 s.f. or 27.5% is <br /> proposed where only 25% is allowed and where 23% exists. Per Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 <br /> (B) the redevelopment of the properry will require approval of an area variance as properry <br /> equals 26,132 s.f. or .59 acres where 1 acre is required. <br /> • � . Page 1 of 5 <br /> � Fam 5005 OIsM Wono <br /> a <br />