Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,June 10,2019 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> improve the property and it will increase the tax base for the City on land that is currently not generating <br /> any revenue for the City. The neighbor that lives on the other side of the right-of-way resides here for <br /> only a few months out of the year. <br /> Further, at the Planning Commission meeting there was some discussion about emergency access. The <br /> point was made that there is ample access to the lake even though there is not free public access. Across <br /> the lake there is easy access to the lake, and unless a lot of time and money is spent improving that 50- <br /> foot piece, it will not provide vehicular access to the lake. <br /> Paidosh noted 1887 is well over 100 years ago and that he does not know what is going to change,but <br /> they are now 120 years out and no one has expressed any interest in it. Paidosh stated he did not have any <br /> interest in it for over 20 years, but it was driven out of necessity in building a new house. <br /> Walsh stated the City Council relies on the Planning Commission to vet the applications and that he was a <br /> little disappointed the Planning Commission did not have all of the information. As a result,the Council <br /> becomes the Planning Commission in a sense by having to vet the information. Walsh stated he is <br /> concerned and disappointed that this process is a little tainted and that he is not sure how to get around <br /> that at this point. <br /> Seals stated the applicant's explanation helped clear up the process and it goes back to why everyone is <br /> on a different page since it seems like everyone had a different piece of information. After the <br /> explanation, it does make sense to vacate it, but that she does not want the City to be apathetic in how <br /> they got here. Seals stated they need to do better, and if Staff suggests something,the Planning <br /> Commission should feel like they have all the information they need. <br /> Rief stated part of the challenge is that the current Comprehensive Plan is where the change happened, <br /> and in the previous Comprehensive Plan it was always a no and the current one says that it is a maybe. <br /> Staff has discussed about how to go about this better but that they are talking about 100 years of <br /> vacations. <br /> Seals stated her concern is what would have happened if the applicant had given up. <br /> Walsh indicated he spoke with the City Administrator on Friday and asked for Staff to repopulate with <br /> some of this specific information. Staff did not do so but the applicant did,which is concerning. <br /> Printup asked if the applicant has any pictures of the terrain. <br /> Paidosh indicated he does not,but the best way is to look at the drawing gradients. <br /> Crosby asked how wide the path is. <br /> Paidosh stated you can get a riding mower down it. <br /> Johnson asked if the applicant is going to come back to the City Council with a request for a variance if <br /> the vacation is approved. <br /> Paidosh stated his understanding is that there either there is an average or a point of tangency of the house <br /> closest to the lake and the house that is nearby. <br /> Page 12 of 20 <br />