Laserfiche WebLink
! ardcover than encourage the Property owner to reduce hardcover 69 approving the Permit. I believe the so called <br /> "illegal"hardcover was there prior to the current hardcover code so I do not understand how or why the property <br /> owner should 6e penalized. <br /> in response to needing to reduce the retaining wall hardcover 6,9 1++69.4. 1 would like to know how you propose to <br /> accomplish this feet.)=or this particular property it would 6e like suggesting only 6uilding 2 of the 4 walls of a house. It <br /> just doesn't work and would not 6e structurally sound or correct. <br /> It is mg understanding that the City plans to make changes this year which will state that boulder retaining walls do <br /> not count against the hardcover percentage and this will take effect in less than two months. Is this correct?If this is <br /> true then the issue of the retaining wall 6eing over in hardcover should 6e a mute point. <br /> The property owner is trying to work with the City of Orono 69 decreasing the percentage of hardcover on his <br /> property and improve the value of his property at the same time.The City of Orono on the other hand seems set <br /> upon having the distinction of 6eing one of if not the most difficult city to work with in Minnesota. It is mg belief that <br /> the City of Orono is not interested in working with the residents of Orono to improve their property and that the <br /> City is only interested in making improvements as difficult as possible for the residents of Orono.The alternative is <br /> to have the hardcover percentage remain at 55.4%. <br /> look forward to meeting with you to resolve these issues. <br /> Chris baker <br /> ChristopherA.baker C) 612-566-5+++ O) 952-+72-5265 r) 952--+72-2558 <br /> Artistic Landscapes Inc. <br /> email to:chris@artisticlandscapes.6iz <br /> Pease visit our web site at: <br /> htt�://www.artistic�anc�sca�es.6iz <br /> 3 <br />