Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, November 27, 2017 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />9. PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN — Continued <br />Printup stated he is a little hesitate about the trails given the number of other trails in the city and that he <br />is not in favor of the boat for Big Island. <br />Edwards indicated the City might have an option to partner on a boat with a sister city. <br />Printup stated in his view the CIP is not over the top and that it would be nice to have some winter <br />activities out at the golf course. <br />The City Council took no formal action on this item. <br />PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT <br />7. #17-3970 — PAUL VOGSTROM ON BEHALF OF WILLIAM AND SUE DUNKLEY, <br />209 WALTERS PORTS LANE, VARIANCES — RESOLUTION NO. 6811 <br />Printup stated his main point with the application is that there appears to be a pretty big difference <br />between what was presented at the Planning Commission and what is now being proposed. Printup noted <br />the Planning Commission appears to be supportive of this plan based on their past comments. <br />Walsh stated he would like to understand what has changed from the last meeting to today. <br />Curtis stated following the feedback received at the Planning Commission regarding all of their <br />applications, the applicants took a step back and looked at their primary goal, which is to construct the <br />addition onto their home. Curtis stated while the applicants have bigger plans for the property, they are <br />now focused on the addition and have removed their plans for the third lot at this point. <br />Curtis stated the applicants are proposing to basically maintain a Pence Lane driveway, a Walters Port <br />driveway, and a Walters Port address. The addition will require a variance to the 75 -foot setback and the <br />average lakeshore setback, which will now be determined by the Hueller's home on the east and the house <br />to the north. That setback line is completely behind the applicant's home, so therefore the addition is <br />completely ahead of it. <br />In addition, the applicants will be submitting a restoration plan to address the work that was done in the <br />0-75 to remove vegetation. The retaining walls in that area are no longer being proposed. There is 130 <br />square feet of additional structure within the 0-75 foot setback, which is the connection between the <br />existing home and the addition. The applicants will also be enclosing the area where there is a hot tub <br />and a deck. Curtis noted the addition will be primarily behind the 75 -foot setback. <br />Walsh stated he understands the issues with the connection and the hardship associated with that. <br />Crosby asked if the applicants will be maintaining their Walters Port address. <br />Curtis indicated they will be. <br />Crosby asked if they will be selling off a portion of the second lot. <br />Page 7 of 12 <br />