My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-11-2017 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2017
>
12-11-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2019 11:13:20 AM
Creation date
5/29/2019 10:50:36 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
351
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
fill being added to the existing site. A conditional use permit is required if there is 500 or more cubic <br />yards of earth being moved on a site. A portion of this cutting and filling will occur in the 0-75 foot lake <br />yard. The applicant is anticipating the total number of trucks could range between 130-230 depending on <br />the soil conditions. <br />Included in Staff report is a lot analysis. Staff finds the purpose of the variances for the wetland setbacks <br />and exceeding the 8 -foot driveway width are reasonable. The placement of the driveway is limited and <br />the grading on the site is reasonable and consistent with the preliminary plat. The development of the <br />proposed lots is consistent with the neighborhood to create two new single-family homes. The proximity <br />to the wetland for the shared driveway is reasonable and consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and will <br />not alter the character of the area. <br />In addition to the City's CUP requirements for filling/grading within the floodplain district activity is <br />subject to a floodplain alteration permit governed by the MCWD. The applicant has submitted an <br />application to the MCWD along with the required plans and engineering. Staff finds the proposed <br />vacation and conditional use permits for the project reasonable. <br />Staff does not support filling in the wetland for the beach improvements. <br />The Planning Commission should discuss the impact of trucking and hauling earth to and from this site <br />and whether conditions should be imposed in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the <br />variances. <br />Suggested motions have been included in Staff report, including recommended conditions. Staff <br />recommends denial of the wetland filling for the beach improvements. <br />Thiesse asked if anything has changed dramatically from the preliminary plat. Thiesse stated it is his <br />recollection the Planning Commission had placed a limit on the amount of fill that could be brought in. <br />Oakden stated she is not sure how that corresponded with the City Council's final approval but that she <br />will look into that. <br />Thiesse stated it was direction to the applicant to provide an idea of the amount of fill that would be <br />brought in. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.