Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. <br />9. Vacation of the following easements: <br />a. Sanitary Sewer Easement (Document 855727) <br />b. Sanitary Sewer Easement (Document 862192) <br />VARIANCE ANALYSIS: <br />In considering this application for variance, the Council has considered the advice and <br />recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variance <br />upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic <br />conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values <br />of property in the surrounding area. <br />2. "Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes <br />and intent of the ordinance ...." The intent of the wetland setback is to preserve the <br />wetland. The applicant proposes minimal improvements in the only location <br />feasible. The applicant plans to utilize BMP to minimize and protect the wetland. <br />The intent of the driveway width maximum is to minimize hardcover in the shore <br />setback. Allowing for a 12' wide shared driveway to gain access to two parcels is <br />in harmony with the purpose of the Ordinances, which is to manage hard cover in <br />the 0-75'. <br />3. "Variances shall only be permitted . . . when the variances are consistent with the <br />comprehensive plan." The Comprehensive Plan balances the right to use property <br />and the need to protect natural resources. The reduced setback in the minimum <br />necessary to afford safe access to the property without impacting adjacent private <br />properties. Allowing access and proper drainage for two newly created lots in <br />consistent with the comprehensive plan. <br />4. "Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are <br />practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. `Practical difficulties,' as used in <br />connection with the granting of a variance, means that: <br />a. The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, <br />however, the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls. <br />The applicant's request to construct a 12' wide driveway and create proper <br />drainage to serve the two newly created lots is reasonable. There is no other <br />location available that would avoid impacts to the wetlands and outside the <br />lake yard without impacting the adjacent residential lot. <br />The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created <br />by the landowner. The applicant did not develop the point, or place wetlands <br />